Advertisement
Since the Gates incident I have read and participated in several discussions about police and police behavior and abuse of power etc.... and what has made the biggest impression on me is how many people seem to feel comfortable with the notion that we should always just keep our heads down and never question the police and their actions because they have tough jobs and because they have authority. Even in that youtube video of the naked guy getting tazered there are tons of comments where people express the opinion that he deserved what he got because he was a stupid naked hippy. Never mind that his crime was simply being drunk and naked at a music festival.
I don't know if it is a majority or just a vocal majority but there are a lot of people out there who seem to feel that mouthing off to the police is reason enough to be arrested and/or abused by the police. In the end so many corrupt officers get away with doing what they do because so much of the public feels they should have unconditional support, that we have no right to ask questions when confronted by them and that we shouldn't second guess them because they have tough jobs. People feel comfortable with the notion that as good citizens we should give up our rights in the presence of a police officer. So my question is what can we do about the public's perception and expectation of what is acceptable? Can something be done? Because if that doesn't change I don't see how the system will.
I don't know if it is a majority or just a vocal majority but there are a lot of people out there who seem to feel that mouthing off to the police is reason enough to be arrested and/or abused by the police. In the end so many corrupt officers get away with doing what they do because so much of the public feels they should have unconditional support, that we have no right to ask questions when confronted by them and that we shouldn't second guess them because they have tough jobs. People feel comfortable with the notion that as good citizens we should give up our rights in the presence of a police officer. So my question is what can we do about the public's perception and expectation of what is acceptable? Can something be done? Because if that doesn't change I don't see how the system will.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Fri, August 14, 2009 - 5:05 PMHmmm I guess it is easier to bitch about the police than it is to actually confront some of the real issues surrounding the problems with police abuse. -
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 6:30 AMThat is because it has been discussed
extremehonesty.tribe.net/threa...b7f15c
I think a vast majority believe we have pretty well discussed it to death
JSin -
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 9:34 AMNo really it hasn't.
But even if it had been. I didn't realize that there was a rule in here that if a topic has been touched upon that it should never be discussed again.
Perhaps we should have a thread that lists all the topics that have been mentioned that way we can all know what to not ever mention again. -
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 10:05 AMI have one: What does extreme honesty mean to you? -
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 11:02 AMquel - "What does extreme honesty mean to you?"
Second that one for the list of tired/now boring topics if you're not a newbie (or a troll, of course, apparently it's one it/they don't tire of). -
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 11:08 AMYes. If one wants to explore a subject that someone else may have discussed then of course they must be a troll.
One wonders why some don't ever tire of shouting "troll." -
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 1:46 PMWow.. careful Y... you may break an ankle jumping to conclusions.
JSin -
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 1:47 PMReally and what conclusion might that be?
Please do tell me what it is I am thinking.
By the way if you are ever confused about who someone is responding to you can hit the little in response to link on their post and it will take you straight to the specific post they were responding to.
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 2:19 PMI don't know what your [everyone] feelings are on the topic, but when presented with an impasse between my opinion and someone else's differing one, I prefer to take the position of "we should agree to disagree". A healthy debate does not need to end in a change in your opponent's opinion, but should always end in respect for each other.
But I could be totally off the mark. Just my perception. -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 2:24 PMwith Anne on this
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 2:25 PMI've seen a lot of talk about the police and their issue but I'm specifically interested in why the public accepts what goes on. Like I said before it seems as thought people feel comfortable with the notion that as good citizens we should give up our rights in the presence of a police officer. So my question is what can we do about the public's perception and expectation of what is acceptable? Can something be done?
I'm not trying to enter an ongoing debate about the police and their failures and what to call them and so forth. That is a dead horse so far as I am concerned (in this thread). I'm more interested in why we as citizens are so willing to give up our rights in their presence and turn our heads and ignore when the rights of others are violated. -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 2:43 PMWell, to address your question: I guess I haven't responded on this thread because it doesn't seem to me like the public *is* all hunky-dory with police abuses of power. There are protests, even riots, over this.
However. When I was in my hippie "alternative" high school, they offered a class that I took called "Street Law". It primarily focused on the 4th Amendment (search & seizure), and what the police could and could not legally demand of you. It didn't end up being incredibly relevant to me personally, as I rarely have anything in my possession that is illegal, but what it *did* do is encourage me to understand my rights and have confidence in the face of attempted police intimidation. I think if more courses were offered to high-school and college-age students identifying their personal rights, kids may grow up with a better sense of confidence around police.
What's going to be beneficial in the face of uncalled-for brutality, I don't know... -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 2:59 PM<<There are protests, even riots, over this. >>
We do have them but usually it seems for only the most extreme cases. Someone has to get shot usually before people are outraged or even concerned. Or it has to be a deaf person with a learning disability getting tased for a significant amount of people to care. And it feels like (at least to me that is) it is the same immigrant, minority, hippie, alternative lifestyle folks who are always doing the protesting. Not that they don't matter but what about everyone else? I think it some places like the Bay Area and West LA and Portland etc... it can seem like a lot of people care but I am not so convinced that these pockets of population represent enough of the general population.
<<However. When I was in my hippie "alternative" high school, they offered a class that I took called "Street Law". It primarily focused on the 4th Amendment (search & seizure), and what the police could and could not legally demand of you. It didn't end up being incredibly relevant to me personally, as I rarely have anything in my possession that is illegal, but what it *did* do is encourage me to understand my rights and have confidence in the face of attempted police intimidation. I think if more courses were offered to high-school and college-age students identifying their personal rights, kids may grow up with a better sense of confidence around police.>>
That would be great if classes like that were more widespread. I'm not sure everyone really understands their personal rights and why they are important to maintain.
<<What's going to be beneficial in the face of uncalled-for brutality, I don't know... >>
Yeah, I'm not sure either but maybe if more people understood their rights they would be more outraged when they see how often they are being violated. -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 3:23 PM<<I'm not sure everyone really understands their personal rights>>
Almost as important: I don't think everyone understands what the police *do* have the legal right to demand of you. It turns into a pissing contest a lot of times, and the citizen will end up getting fucked over when they would have been better off complying to a legal demand. -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 10:40 AM<<It turns into a pissing contest a lot of times, and the citizen will end up getting fucked over when they would have been better off complying to a legal demand.>>
This is also true.
I can't help but ponder on the Gates case. People were so caught up in the whole "race" issue that no one seemed to be concerned with the fact that a man got arrested for disorderly conduct on his own front porch. It seems clear the police officer was completely in the right to demand ID from him but after that is where it totally blows my mind that everyone glazed over.
Lots of people seem to be of the opinion that he (Gates) got what was coming to him because he should have known better than to yell at a police officer. The officers need to be there was clearly done at that point so Gate's yelling was probably a jerk move but what law does that break? What is more people seem comfortable with the fact that when he demanded to get his name and badge number that the police officer didn't feel the need to cooperate. Instead he told him he would only talk to him outside and then proceeded to arrest him when Gates carried on in the same tone outside. Kind of smells like entrapment.
The officer is receiving standing ovations and too many people are chalking it up to a misunderstanding but to me it is worrisome that we accept that "irritating" an officer is a justifiable reason to be arrested. And not listening to them is enough of a reason to get tazed. -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 10:51 AMY - "to me it is worrisome that we accept that "irritating" an officer is a justifiable reason to be arrested."
Who is this "we" you speak of and if you include yourself as someone who thinks that it's justifiable reason to be arrested, perhaps you can provide the answer to your own question about what motivates some people to do this? Obviously those of us who don't hold these beliefs don't have the insight that those who do would have about their own motivations (and plenty of Americans - both professional pundits and average citizens - seem to not accept the belief you propose and have pointed out that it was an unjustifiable arrest on numerous grounds). -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 11:18 AMI mean we as a nation. I don't know about in Canada but using "we" isn't all that uncommon when one speaks of ones nation. Nor do people usually go out of their way to express confusion over such and obvious use of the word.
Are you hear to discuss or to nitpick? Or are you gearing up for another chance to shout "troll!"
Obviously not every individual. But a majority of people accept that if you piss off an officer you are getting what you deserve when you get arrested. Even if the charges get dropped later. -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 11:43 AMY - I'm here to discuss but you seem more interested in making personal comments and snide remarks it seems from your post (which I find very ironic since you have in the past claimed to be the victim of trolls both here and in other tribes...and made a big deal about your personal troll dramas in this tribe...it appears that you have one rule for yourself and another for other people).
Now, back to the topic and your objection to me asking you what your motives are as part of the "we". No one I know says "we" when they're not including themselves in that we - I don't say "we Canadians believe such and such" when I personally believe something else (it would be retarded to since I'd then be proposing that I believe something I don't simply because I'm Canadian). Since clearly there are quite a few Americans who don't share the views you propose - and have been vocal about their differing views on the matter - the "we" you're speaking about can't be the whole nation. You keep making claims about "the majority of people" but have actually produced no evidence to show that this is what the majority of Americans believe - do you yourself hold the belief that you're proposing or do you only think it's most other Americans that believe what you're proposing and you're an exception? -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 1:08 PMBored now.
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 1:17 PM<<(which I find very ironic since you have in the past claimed to be the victim of trolls both here and in other tribes...and made a big deal about your personal troll dramas in this tribe...it appears that you have one rule for yourself and another for other people). >>
But I do find it pretty amusing that you feel able to comment on events concerning me that you obviously don't know shit about. -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 1:28 PMY - Actually you were the one who told me about it when I first joined this tribe so what I know about it is from what you've said in this tribe to me and the claims you've made in this tribe that trolls are out to get you (or someone in the tribe is out to troll you personally). I'm just commenting on the fact you've made these claims, I have no idea whether you were being honest about your experiences or if your version of events was accurate. I have begun to doubt they were. The point is, you've spent plenty of time in this tribe claiming people are trolls who joined EH (and other tribes) to personally troll you. You painted yourself as quite the victim. The other point is that you're the one busy making snide personal remarks and not actually discussing the issues while claiming that this is what others do. -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 1:32 PMNo Fifi, I never told you that. Stop trying to twist words around. -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 2:12 PMY - Really, you're the only one who keeps making it personal with the snide remarks and total refusal to actually discuss the issues (and you don't just do it to me) and you really did make a big fuss about how you were personally being trolled (whether you choose to remember doing so or not, you painted yourself as a victim). At the time I thought it was pretty horrible from what you described, particularly since you were pregnant. However, I have come to question your version of events. Particularly after watching you do what you decry over and over again to specific individuals (refuse to discuss the issue by making it personal instead, etc). I don't expect you to care about what I say or even be honest at this point (since it seems you can't be honest with yourself about this matter and have different rules for others than you do for yourself). -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 2:20 PMFifi, you seriously just don't know what you are talking about.
-
-
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 1:41 PM<<I have begun to doubt they were.>>
Oh well, now that Fifi no longer believes in me what shall I do?
Somehow I will muddle through.
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 2:12 PM>>The point is, you've spent plenty of time in this tribe claiming people are trolls who joined EH (and other tribes) to personally troll you. You painted yourself as quite the victim.<<
whoa there, hold on now.
i've been in this tribe since 2005 and i've never seen Yuni "painting herself as a victim"
or claiming masses of trolls were out to get her.
i have seen a couple of issues go down over the years that have involved
deliberate fucking with Yuni,
you were around for one of them (Harold), but that hardly constitutes the extremes you describe.
-
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 2:36 PMwild - All I know is what I was told by Yuni when we were "friends" and what I've seen myself. Of course I don't know the whole story (nor do I really care to at this point since I'm getting rather sick of Yuni going on about "it's not personal" and then getting personal instead of discussing the issue). I do know how Yuni painted herself to me (back before she unfriended me and started being hostile because I friended Harold - without realizing they were at war - because he seemed like a rather sad and confused bisexual whose social problems seemed to come from childhood abuse and I felt sorry for him at the time). She made a big deal of how she was pregnant at the time and how outrageous it was that someone would troll a pregnant woman - she may remember it different but that's certainly how it came across and I was sympathetic to her story since I *do* think it's a pretty shitty thing to do to anyone pregnant or not).
Anyway. The point is that Yuni decries people taking things personally and not discussing the issues when she keeps making snide personal remarks and avoiding talking about the issue. Yuni can be intelligent and interesting - and I recognize that some of you are very good friends with her and therefore protective - my only beef with her is that she keeps doing this. I think it's worth calling someone out on in EH. -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 2:41 PM<<All I know is what I was told by Yuni when we were "friends" and what I've seen myself.>>
Oh please. Don't try to play it like being on my friend's list for a brief amount of time means I confided anything to you. Once upon a time you asked me questions and I answered them with not much detail.
<<She made a big deal of how she was pregnant at the time and how outrageous it was that someone would troll a pregnant woman>>
Uh again that is not how it happened. You just don't know all the facts.
<<I do know how Yuni painted herself to me (back before she unfriended me and started being hostile because I friended Harold >>
Hahahahahaha! I didn't friend you when you friended Harold! Hilarious. I paired down my friends list ages ago to people I actually like and give a shit about and would trust to read my personal blogs and sorry but you didn't make the cut. You got dropped at the same time that at least 30 other people did.
Is that what all this is about? -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 2:53 PMOh and just to be clear I have emptied out my friend's list many times over the years. At one point I dropped everyone with the exception of one friend who is now deceased and I just couldn't let go of his profile because of sentimental reasons.
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 2:57 PMY - Oh please, who cares about the details of your ancient troll drama - it's not really the point (though you do seem to think that you should be the only person to discuss trolls or point out when someone is being one - once again you've got a double standard which you seem unaware of). Your pattern seems to be to make snide personal remarks then claim you're not being personal - and then trying to set up "sides" in EH. Clearly you're more interested in interpersonal bickering than discussing the actual topic since you didn't notice that this topic was discussed already and keep avoiding actually discussing it. Now this IS getting boring and I don't expect you to actually act with integrity here since it seems that your agenda IS to make it personal. I'm done, feel free to have the last word or pretend you didn't say what you did (and no, I wasn't under the illusion that we had an intimate relationship or that you were confiding in me when you told me these things).
What this is all about is your claims to want to talk about the issue and then avoiding the issue while making snide personal remarks. I've seen you do this to numerous people so I don't take it personally so, no, it's not about you "unfriending" me at all (though that's some hubris you're showing if you think your internet "friendship" is that important...yikes!) -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 3:16 PM<<Y - Oh please, who cares about the details of your ancient troll drama >>
Evidently you do. You are the one who brought it up.
<<(though that's some hubris you're showing if you think your internet "friendship" is that important...yikes!) >>
Again, YOU are the one who brought up being unfriended by me. If it isn't that important to you then why bring it up?
-
-
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 2:51 PMwow.
this thread is some funny shit.
i can't believe it went from discussing a pertinent topic to nitpicking
on the use of the term 'we' to rehashing old irrelevant babble.
wheeeeeee, EH!
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 4:20 PMCan't we all just get along? -
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 4:35 PMOh look Rodney made an appearance does this mean we've reached the point where we've earned a drink/party thread?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Somewhat off-topic, but... this is all seeming like it's getting personal.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 3:10 PMAnne - "Well, to address your question: I guess I haven't responded on this thread because it doesn't seem to me like the public *is* all hunky-dory with police abuses of power. There are protests, even riots, over this."
I tend to agree - plus many of those of us who have been discussing this topic are people who clearly aren't okay with it and some of us have engaged in (successfully) changing some police policy/behavior (though changing policy doesn't always mean attitudes or actions actually change) and have already discussed this. Also it's almost always citizen activism/action that provides evidence of police brutality (thanks to the increased access to video technology) and publicizes it (thanks to the internet). Besides, knowing your rights means nothing when dealing with police who don't care about your rights (not surprisingly, the kinds of cops who abuse power clearly aren't ones who actually act as they're meant to and respect rights).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 11:09 AM<<I have one: What does extreme honesty mean to you? >>
There is also that old "What is the difference between truth and honesty" sometimes re-introduced as "Are truth and honesty the same?"
-
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Sun, August 16, 2009 - 10:56 AMThere isn't a rule. I was actually being kind and letting you know it had been touched upon and give you a bit of insight as to perhaps why no one opted to continue the conversation.
JSin
-
-
-
-
Re: Police aren't the real problem, the citizens are.
Tue, August 18, 2009 - 8:21 AMProhibition, the War On Drugs and systemic oppression from an ex-cop's point of view...
rawstory.com/blog/2009/0...ost-readers/
"Only after years of witnessing the ineffectiveness of drug policies -- and the disproportionate impact the drug war has on young black men -- have we and other police officers begun to question the system."
From my perspective, policemen openly acknowledging that there are systemic problems is much more likely to effect real change than blaming individuals (be it citizens or cops) or protests by citizens. Not to mention much less hostile to both citizens and police, and a starting point for real discussion regarding change that considers all involved as human beings and police work as being a social profession and not a paramilitary one which regards the public as an enemy of the state and themselves as the embodiment of the state.