Why are people so polarized about this topic? I don't get it. I know plenty of friends who don't want children. I don't like to assume it is because they hate children, one of my best friends is a teacher and loves children but just doesn't want any. Good for her, I say. I respect that if someone doesn't want a child they should not have one. I get the whole push for zero population but hey I am also a mom and I love being a mom. Why are people so black and white about this issue? I respect other people's choices.....however I don't respect people who rant about wanting a child free society or make fun of breeders (for just having a child - there are types of breeders even I can't stand) and make remarks about how klds are nasty little brats.
Kids are a part of society. We were all children once. There is just no getting around that. I usually feel a bit sad for people who actually hate kids because I think it has something to do with them hating their own childhood. Also how is it OK to hate on any significant portion of society whether they be kids, jews, whites, blacks or whomever. I find that trippy. Maybe I am seeing this the wrong way though. I'd love to hear what others think about this.
Kids are a part of society. We were all children once. There is just no getting around that. I usually feel a bit sad for people who actually hate kids because I think it has something to do with them hating their own childhood. Also how is it OK to hate on any significant portion of society whether they be kids, jews, whites, blacks or whomever. I find that trippy. Maybe I am seeing this the wrong way though. I'd love to hear what others think about this.
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Wed, April 2, 2008 - 12:17 PMI have a friend who has never had, nor had any desire to have, children.
She's a fabulous woman and i love her dearly... she loves our friends' kids,
just chooses not to have any herself.
Her boyfriend *hates* children, and will go on and on about it at any freaking
opportunity. He once commented on how he loves that she does too - she
was quick to correct him, that she didn't HATE them, just didn't want them either...
(that said, the guy HAS one that he's always refused to even meet, so he's a
different sort of person than i can understand as it is.)
I can't understand people that say they 'hate' children... they were one... children
are just people in a different stage of life and learning than we are...
i, personally, love kids. and consider myself lucky that so far, kids love me too.
i don't have any, and don't know if i ever will... but i do know that i want children
to always be a part of my life in, whatever way that proves to happen.
the people that rail on about overpopulation... fine. i agree that it's a problem. but
i don't think that means we need to take away a person's right to have kids... but
the people i've heard referred to as 'breeders' do drive me crazy... the ones that have
six or seven screaming brats running wild around a restaurant because they either
a) were too careless to use protection, or b) are too careless to put in the time and
energy to RAISING these children.... those are the ones i want to curbstomp.
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Wed, April 2, 2008 - 1:10 PMI have two daughters and love being a parent but I can also understand the appeal of not taking on a responsibility to another person like that. Being a responsible parent has changed many of the choices I made for the last 18 plus years but I wouldn't trade the experience of parenting for anything. It's simultaneously the most challenging thing I do and the most rewarding.
I think its important to continue to seek out social activities where you can engage as an adult as opposed to a parent. Helps keep things balanced.
I find that most people seem to respect and support my choice to be a parent although a lot of the people I know are childless. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Wed, April 2, 2008 - 4:41 PM<<but I can also understand the appeal of not taking on a responsibility to another person like that.>>
Oh yeah I totally get that. I really feel like only people who want kids and are totally committed to raising and loving them should have them. I think the world is better for us all if people who don't want to have kids don't have them. Still as a species we are bound to want to reproduce so kids are just going to exist. I don't want to breed away and have child after child until I have a baseball team but I don't feel guilty about wanting two.
I also get irritated with those crazy folks who treat kids like an accessory and get those giant expensive strollers along with inflated senses of entitlement and seem to think the world exists just to worship them and their baby. Some of them have the attitude that if you aren't having kids you aren't as good as them or you are selfish or you are missing something. I can see how this would piss off someone who doesn't have kids.
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 9:41 AM> the appeal of not taking on a responsibility to another person like that
Actually it was a feeling of deep responsibility to the planet that led me not to have children. Too many of us. I was going to adopt, but for many and complex reasons (including not being a US citizen and so no right to international adoption) I didn't.
To the original question, I like kids--some kids, anyway--and love my nieces. I get stroppy around parents and kids only in a few circumstances:
1. Some women (including my sister) run this total superiority of Mama gig, whereby I as a non-mother have zero status, and have not lived. She on the other hand works harder than anyone can imagine, as a stay-at-home mother with two girls who spend all day at school. Give me a fucking break. This drives me insane. I am supposed to bend over backwards and give all kinds of sympathy for Christ knows what imagined hardship, but get none back for anything that happens in my life, because, not having children, clearly I lie around on a cloud all day and sip champagne.
2. Some parents let their children loudly run wild, or shout, to the point where one would just pray for someone to come along with a rifle loaded with buckshot big enough to take the whole lot of them out in one loud bang and then let peace redescend. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 10:07 AMLOL!
those two huge sources of contention to me as well, Kalsang...
last time a mom friend of mine said "you'll never understand, you don't
have kids" i was forced to retaliate with "fuck you, i fed yours, took them
to the park, and put them to bed last week when you were too hungover
to get out of bed." -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 10:19 AMhear hear, kalsang
those sentiments bite even harder for women like me who can't have children. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 12:16 PMSee, I think it is points like this that get polarized though. Like I can also not like it when other people let their kids run wild but I also know sometimes kids are going to be kids and I think it is awful selfish and just plain un-realistic when people get upset and start casting dirty looks the moment they hear a peep out of someone's child. I have been that mom on a ten hour flight from Scotland whose baby got fed up and had to cry a bit. I was just as upset as anyone else and it didn't make things any easier that people were giving me dirty looks and huffing out loud. Truth be told he was all in all a whole lot quieter than the drunk guy a few rows up who had to tell his whole life story to the person in the seat right next to him in the loudest voice possible. My kid actually slept 9 out of the 10 hours but I sure got some dirty looks when he cried for a few minutes anyway.
And I care about the planet too. I often hear people say they didn't have kids because they care about the planet but I do too. Having a child isn't a sign that I care less for our planet or even a sign that I do less. There are a whole lot of ways to care. And I don't like people who think having babies makes them special either. They annoy me.
It so often seems to turn into a this side or that side thing though. People without babies think they are being looked down upon and people with babies do too.
And children make noise, that is a fact of life. Yes, we can teach them to be polite but be aware to that overly "trained," overly polite constantly corrected children rarely grow up to be Picasso or Stephen Hawkings or Einstein. Just saying. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 12:29 PMI was recently on one of those flights and some babies cried a bit, but that's par for the course. I was also recently on the InterCity 125 where there were two families, each with a staggering four children. (I felt like wandering over with some free condoms and doing some quiet explaining to the parents, but that's another story.)
One family's kids played quietly and read and chatted, and the other lot shouted, climbed about, screamed at each other, and were generally noisier than a cageful of macaques. THAT's what I'm talking about, not the normal odd squeak, toddler voices, or yell for Mama when you fall over and NEED Mama.
My comment about responsibility was not intended to suggest that I have the monopoly on caring for the planet, just to counter Rich's presupposition that parents have the monopoly on responsibility and that non-parents are shirking responsibility because they don't want to take it on. There are different ways of feeling and manifesting responsibility, and as Ginette Paris says, sometimes a good parenting decision is to have an abortion. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 4:06 PM<<Rich's presupposition that parents have the monopoly on responsibility and that non-parents are shirking responsibility because they don't want to take it on.>>
See, it is interesting that you read it that way. I didn't. Why would anyone assume that not wanting a particular responsibility mean that you are shirking responsibility as a whole? I know I don't think that and I kind of doubt Rich meant it that way.
I could write that I don't want the responsibility of a dog but I don't think that means I am not a responsible person or even that I don't like dogs. I also don't want the responsibility of home ownership at this point in our lives because having a land lord handle things is easier for us but that doesn't mean I am shirking responsibility. It is all about choices. We all have them and we should all respect that others do too.
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 12:04 PMI had been married for 13 years and we never planned on having children, when my future ex-wife became pregnant by accident (we accidently fucked :-) So I've gotten to see both sides and I hated constantly being asked "when are you two going to have a baby?" for thirteen years. On the other hand raising my son has been the best experience of my life, but I still would never tell anyone to have kids, and I certainly don't think you haven't lived until you've had them.
As far as the disgusting people with large litters of unmannered boogereaters, they are the problem. It's not overpopulation of good, interesting, intelligent, caring, hardworking people that is ruining the world, it's these consumptive morons living on fast food and vacationing at Disneyland while stuffing the garbage can with disposable diapers. The worst part is they are out breeding the rest of you! Yes, I know I am judgemental and sound like Hitler, but it's the truth and there is no race or culture that is not infested with these people.
>She on the other hand works harder than anyone can imagine, as a stay-at-home mother with two girls who spend all day at school. Give >me a fucking break.<
Yeah, kalsanq, I had the same issue with my ex. One kid, going to school, I worked full time as a mechanic and still cooked dinner almost every night and she couldn't keep the house clean or the bills paid with no job, but guess who got all the pity parties? Poor little Mama! -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 4:19 PMAs someone who has worked since I was 14 and was a stay at home mom for eight months and now is a working mom I can honestly say that staying at home was far more exhausting for me than anything. There are no five minute breaks and barely even time to shower let alone clean and cook. Even when my son napped I was busy running around trying to get shit done before he woke up again. In some ways returning to work was easier because even though I work with kids, at least there I have support from co-workers and at least now the work at home is divided more evenly. I am lucky though to have a partner who did try staying home with the baby a few times and he was so exhausted by it that he gave me major props and after that totally volunteered to cook when he came home from work.
-
-
-
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 10:59 AMI loooove kids. Love 'em. I like how much fun they're capable of, how creative they are, and how malleable they are. The closer those synapses are the more robot names and comic book characters I can pack into their tiny brains.
As for moms feeling superior about being moms, it's because for many of them, it's *all they have*. They don't balance an adult life with a mom life and soon all they can do to validate themselves is look at all the work of parenting.
This can happen with dads, but it's typically easier to see through their facade and to the disappointment of not being able to get fucked up occasionally or get that weekly basketball game in.
Noisy kids: Welp, you have to nip that shit in the bud and yell at the parents. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 11:41 AM>and how malleable they are
guilty confession:
part of me has always wished that we had time-travel purely so that i could
have a little kid and teach them everything wrong... like the letter written 'A' is
called 'eff', the color of grass is 'purple', etc....and then i could just go back in
time and do it right. because i'm not QUITE evil enough to wanna screw the
poor kid up permanently. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 12:10 PM"guilty confession:"
You SHOULD feel guilty about that.
You get your hands on a time machine and all you do is fuck up some little kid's mind? Where's the Hitler assassination? Where's the global domination? Where's the Back To The Future II brilliance of betting on sports games you already know the outcome of?!?!
You SHOULD feel guilty, Nicole.
Shame on you. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Thu, April 3, 2008 - 4:25 PMIn my younger years, I was very ambivalent about having one of my own, mainly because I come from a large family (who in turn had large families) and frequently felt "lost" among the herd. Over the past few years I've been much more open minded about it, but certain things would need to be in place:
1) a husband
2) a husband who wanted a child (ideally, the same person as #1 ;-)
3) the financial stability to be able to stay home and raise the child myself. (I mean really, what's the sense of having a kid if someone else is going to do this job?)
Without these, I wouldn't dream of having a child. With these in place, I'd seriously consider it - I'd probably stop at one, though. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Fri, April 4, 2008 - 10:15 AMthose kids that scream and shriek and race around? According to nature, they're meant to be tiger food.
I have noticed that kids from other cultures and especially more tribal cultures don't carry on this way.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Fri, April 4, 2008 - 10:41 AMThe following paragraph will no doubt irritate a number of people, but I think the conclusion, as unpalatable as is might be, is quite reasonable.
Not having children is the most ecological decision the average person will ever have the opportunity to make. No matter how “green” their lifestyle, each person contributes pollution to the environment. If you decide not to have children, the pollution that you contribute to the world stops when you die. The decision to have children adds the pollution generated not only by your children, but also your grandchildren, great grandchildren and so forth. The pollution generated by all those future generations far and away outstrips the benefits of any “green” choices that you can implement in your own lifetime. Therefore, the decision to have children is about the most “ungreen” decision a person can possibly make. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Fri, April 4, 2008 - 11:59 AMfair enough.
we're polluting the earth, for sure, no matter if we are the one individual
doing it the least or not (which i doubt anyone here is)... and our children
will have no choice but to do the same.
definitely a valid point.
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Fri, April 4, 2008 - 11:59 AMIt doesn't irritate me. I just don't buy it. I am pretty sure I could find dozens of ways to shit up this planet even if I didn't have kids. And ultimately I think talk like that is a way for people who have made a decision to not have children to feel superior to people who do have children. It is that sort of thing that puzzles me. Why do people on either side of the argument always try to bring in some sort of language that knocks the other's choice? Why does one thing have to inherently be better or more responsible than the other? Plus of all the people who claim they didn't have children because they care about the planet, I only believe about 5% of them actually mean it. The rest had other factors that probably influenced their decision a whole lot more but just cling to that mantra because it is convenient and a conversation stopper.
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Fri, April 4, 2008 - 12:06 PM"The following paragraph will no doubt irritate a number of people, but I think the conclusion, as unpalatable as is might be, is quite reasonable."
I don't find it irritating. In fact, from a strictly logical standpoint it's pretty much impossible to refute. However, we're never operating from a strictly logical standpoint. Even if it were, however, any logical decision on whether or not to have children would hopefully be impacted by more than a single variable like ecology (although I'll admit that's a biggy).
My goal in having children, aside from the selfish cause of loving the hell out of 'em, is that I will slowly, even minutely, infect the world with another person like me. I hope to pass on the things to my sons or daughters that I think are contributions to the community and thus, indirectly to the rest of the world. I'm not sure how one might ascribe a concrete value to something like that in order to compare it to something as easily calculated as a single person's impact on the ecosystem. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Fri, April 4, 2008 - 12:13 PM<<I hope to pass on the things to my sons or daughters that I think are contributions to the community and thus, indirectly to the rest of the world.>>
See? and that is what makes the previous statement possible to refute. We don't know yet what the future holds. Yes, more human beings bring more pollution, strictly speaking, but maybe more conscious humans will balance things out and reverse the trend that we have started. Perhaps through our influence our offspring will chose a more simple life. Plus there is no garuntee that my child will have a child. Plus I know single childless people who drive SUVs, ride airplanes nearly every single weekend, eat out instead of cook at home and live in giant houses with far too many rooms that they air condition needlessly. That alone pollutes the planet more than I have by having a child (who wears cloth diapers by the way). -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Sat, April 5, 2008 - 12:34 PMAnd let's also consider what this world might be like if certain individuals hadn't been born. Among us polluters there are a great many who have effected some truly amazing, positive changes in this world without which our global plight would no doubt be much worse.
This issue, like any controversial issue, cannot be whittled down into a black and white, one-plan-fits-all approach to morality. And while I'm not crazy about a large number of humans, I am incredibly appreciative for many more. In fact, while I could possibly compile a list of humans I consider a waste of space and resources I would be incapable of compiling a list of humans that I am thankful for...those that have enriched my life directly and those that have paved the way for the enrichment of our planet (including the humans currently residing here).
I will not sit here and self righteously justify my decision to have children nor will I condemn others for their child bearing choices, whatever they may be.
-K
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Sat, April 5, 2008 - 2:16 PM>Therefore, the decision to have children is about the most “ungreen” decision a person can possibly make. <
Ditch the car, keep the kid. What's the point of a healthy earth if there is no one to enjoy it? Ultimate green, kill youself in the rain forest and feed the trees. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Sat, April 5, 2008 - 3:45 PMWell, I think a healthy earth would be good whether or not there were humans to enjoy it but still so long as there are humans it would be great if we could strive to achieve one and be glad that we can enjoy it. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Sat, April 5, 2008 - 10:11 PMOh the Earth will be just ducky... Humanity on the other hand, I am becoming more and more convinced we will be disappeared fairly soon.
The Earth has an uncanny ability to eliminate parasites and does so on a regular basis.
Makes me wonder what group will rise to be the next dominant species.
JSin -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Sun, April 6, 2008 - 2:31 PMcockroaches. those fuckers will live through anything. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Mon, April 7, 2008 - 9:19 AMGreetings all. I want to start out by saying that I will only take a moment of your time because, well, after all I am a parent and I only have a moment to give. I stumbled upon this thread while browsing a profile and I thought it sounded interesting. I only joined, however, because all day after reading this particular thread, it bothered and offended me. I had only read to kalsang’s first post. That was the part that I found disturbing. We have a person talking about how she wishes a person would come along and violently murder some children because they are too noisy for her. Of course I am sure no one here or anywhere else can explain to me how kalsang’s rights are more important than a child’s or anyone else’s for that matter. We also have her later talking about giving her talk to some parents who, she feels, have too many children. Sorry dearie, you are not in charge of anyone’s reproductive rights. Furthermore, why on earth would you want to be?? I suggest you go talk to your mother about this whole issue. I am sure she has some beauty full stories from when you were a little girl, in addition to some horror stories. Also, she could probably tell you about some times when she was made to feel very uncomfortable about you and your little girl noises and dramas when she was out with you. Oh, and I know that you can go and adopt a wonder full child in your country of origin. You do not have to adopt internationally. Alhtough if the agency heard you talking the way you have been writing here, they would say absolutely not!
There is also these pesky issues of lack of reproductive ed, rape, and prevalent abuse towards womyn and children. Oh what to do?? We could perpetuate it by spreading some more hate towards children and womyn, or we could show some love people. I knew a womin who was never taught to read. She was sent off to marriage at the ripe old age of 14. She was raped by her husband and her father. She gave birth to a girl child. That girl child, at the age of 14 was married. She was incestually raped and became pregnant. This child has major health problems. There are issues in this society that need to be addressed!! Do not point your judgmental finger at another. Instead of complaining about a child crying because of the pain in his/her ears from the pressure, why don’t you people do something positive to make the world better for ALL of us. Yes, I am suggesting that you think of somebody other than yourselves. May blessings and heart healing come to those who have been hurt, so that they may stop abusing others and move on to their true beauty and calling in life.
I find it disturbing that anyone would wish any violence on a child. This is a major problem in our society and needs immediate attention. I suggest anyone with these thoughts go seek help right away. Here we have a tribe called Extreme Honesty. Doesn’t honesty have to due with truth. The truth here is, there are some people posting to this thread who need to get some help. Children have all ways been here. We were all children once. Children will all ways be a part of society, just like young adults, middle-aged adults, and the elderly. We all make up society. And we are not separate from nature. Children being here are not contributing to pollution. The people making the choices for them are. The next few comments I will make are addressed toward this person Josh, who seemed to have a few issues with womyn in general. To you dear I say this, mom life=adult life for many womyn. This also goes for fathers. When you become a parent, it becomes your life. It cannot be separated from “other aspects” of your life. Also, your yelling at parents for children being noisy only contributes to the noise hun! I know your children are/will be no different from any other in these aspects of noise and what not. I want to add in here that each night, while or after helping my children to bed, I usually hear outside my apartment, adults. I hear adults fighting, I hear them yelling, I hear them partying and carrying on. They wake my children. They keep me up. I hear their dogs barking. I hear their cats getting it on. I hear their darn cars. That’s what I hear man. Not children crying, or playing or laughing. I would much rather hear the children. Go have lunch with your mother. She will tell you. Allow her to share with you, to tell you about your childhood, and the quirky things you did. Talk to your grandmother too, about your mother and/or father. Children are not here to be controlled!! They are here to change the consciousness of the earth….duh. Extreme Honesty. Come to terms with it man. We all must work to make sure these young human’s needs are being met. The only times young ones make a fuss is when their needs are not being met. Engage them with respect and you may learn a thing or two about being human. Moms who are stoked about being moms are what the world needs more of. They’re not just stoked about it because they have nothing else. They are stoked because it’s awesome!!!
Folks, the children are everywhere. If you need a quiet space, make one for yourself. Go there often and ask yourself why it is that you are bothered to violent thoughts about children. Show yourself some love and come to peace with the things from your childhood that hurt. Show a child some love, and a miracle will happen to you. Expect that there will be children when you go out into public and neither they nor their parents have to oblige your thinking that your personal rights are more important than theirs. If you don’t like noise, don’t go out. Listen and you will see that noise happens everywhere, mostly from adults and their tools (of pollution). The children have done nothing wrong…they are only being who they are in a society full of hatred and violence. Being born into a world where people are talking about curb stomping people and blowing away kids with guns isn’t an easy thing to do, for the parents or the children. Wouldn’t you cry out too? Oh yeah, that’s right you did. And someone hopefully comforted you. If not, I am truly sorry, may peace come to you during this child abuse and sexual assault awareness month.
Oh, and I will not be checking back after this post.
PEACE IS IN MAN!! -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Mon, April 7, 2008 - 9:41 AM<<Oh, and I will not be checking back after this post. >>
While I could comment on things that are both positive and negative in your post, I won't even bother because your very last thought negates your whole post anyway. What it says to us is that you did not join this thread to engage in any sort of meaningful conversation from which all participants might contribute, listen and ultimately learn and benefit. Rather you joined to dump your way of thinking onto others and you seem to believe you already know it all so you don't need to stick around for conversation. Thanks for nothing.
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Mon, April 7, 2008 - 9:43 AMOh please, for someone who uses "womyn" an awful lot - a spelling that shows a great disdain and dislike of the word "women" because of its association with "men" - this poster seem blissfully unaware that the particular school of feminism that term comes from has also discussed things such as women only communities and aborting males. Really, if looked at one way the very act of breeding can be seen as oppressive to women (not saying I believe this, just saying it's easy to position it this way....). Particularly if one uses the examples given in amber's post of how it's used to trap, abuse and denigrate women into being bodies to be used for male purposes (sex and breeding new little girls to be used).
My issue is never with the children if there's bad behavior, it's always the parents' responsibility if they've got unsocialized kids with an overdeveloped sense of entitlement. I'd advocate punishing the parents (both of them) for a child's anti-social behavior since that's obviously who they learned it from. Apart from anything else, these are the kinds of kids that grow up to be shitty adults. It's not their fault, clearly, that doesn't make them any less shitty or anti-social. I'd say that in some ways it's abusive to not teach your kid social skills and it may actually make one a bit of an unfit parent, at least in terms of preparing your child for the world. -
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Mon, April 7, 2008 - 9:57 AM*rolls eyes*
nicely said, Why...
''hi, i am coming in here to spout my opinion, and not engage in discourse
of any kind before i make it clear that you are all reprehensible and i leave."
boring. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Mon, April 7, 2008 - 10:05 AMThis topic always seems to get people so sharp edged. It doesn't help though that people treat this tribe like it is a dumping ground for all their righteous indignation. Or should I say self righteous?
-
-
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Mon, April 7, 2008 - 10:08 AMRegardless of Amber's methods (joining, posting, leaving - that's a lot of work for one post!!) she does make a valid point.
And that is ...
Children are not meant to be 'seen and not heard'. That's so archaic it's almost laughable. Kids make noise. They yell. They shriek. They cry. They do a lot of this in public places like restaurants, malls, parks, grocery stores, etc. People who can't handle this need to get over themselves. I'm just as annoyed by people walking around having too-loud cell phone conversations, but I would never think to suggest that they should be shot.
Oh, and I WILL be checking back after this post.
-
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Mon, April 7, 2008 - 10:22 AMLike I said, I chose not to comment on her post because of her method. That is not to say I disagree with all that she said (although I did disagree with several points). Sorry she lost the chance for her words to have any meaning or worth by choosing post aggressively and leave rather than trying to use this opportunity to share ideas and understand why people are so extreme about this topic.
As a mom and someone who works with kids I completely agree that people are ridiculous in their expectation that children should be always quiet. I do however feel they can be taught to be considerate at certain times. I forgot to comment on it but I noticed someone even posted that children in other cultures and tribal cultures don't behave that way. I have to laugh at that one because not only have I seen children in Africa shouting their heads off and climbing all over the place, I also noticed that most people didn't give a shit. Yes, they had well behaved quiet times too. I rode on a bus with goats and chickens. You think a few noisy kids was an issue? Please. People in other cultures for the most part don't expect children to be quiet all the time. Also having spent some time in small indigenous villages in Latin America I can say for sure that children ran around and made plenty of noise. Yes, there were times when they were expected to be quiet but once again most cultures don't treat childhood like it is a disorder that needs to be corrected and controlled.
-
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Mon, April 7, 2008 - 10:45 AMSophie - Children are in the process of learning what is acceptable behavior in different situations. They're human, they can be both loud and quiet, excited and calm, socially aware or all about themselves - like adult humans they run the gamut of personalities and behaviors. I know plenty of kids who know how to get seen and heard without resorting to antisocial behavior, the ones that can't generally have parents who don't know how to get positive attention either. The kid that learns he can get what he wants by pitching a wobbly in the supermarket will continue to have a tantrum whenever he wants something because it works. A kid that learns that screaming and throwing food in a restaurant is okay will continue versions of this his whole adult life. A kid that never learns how to socialize and practice consideration for others will grow up to be an adult with exactly the same qualities. I can pretty much guarantee that adults who walk around talking too loud on their telephones were once children with a disproportionate sense of their own importance and entitlement.
Once again, it's all about the parents avoiding their responsibilities to care for their children, not the actual kids (they're just victims of their parents lack of actual care for them and/or lack of basic social skills). The worst behaved kids are only acting as extensions of their parents (barring an actual neurobiological disorder). -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Child Free vs With Child
Mon, April 7, 2008 - 10:58 AMThe world really doesn't need more people thinking that being loud is a "talent" that is rewarded by attention. Haven't you people seen the tryouts for American Idol? Isn't that warning enough!?!!?! People, people.....I beseech you, give the kids a chance to grow up into more than cartoon characters!
Seriously, teaching kids that they'll be rewarded with attention for being interesting, intelligent, attentive to others, kind, patient, funny, honest and those other things that most of us admire in others is helping them by nurturing qualities that will help them in life. Sure you can get what you want by being a bully, getting angry or throwing a loud tantrum sometimes as an adult but it's really not the most effective way to live at any age and reveals to the world a really low level of emotional maturity and personal integrity. It teaches anger is power and that the way to cope with frustration is through violence, not exactly great tools to send a kid out into the world with and expect them to do well.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-