Advertisement
Just a rant.
The beautiful men I've met seem to have this self-perception that their mere presence is a gift to others that requires little effort on their part other than simply being there. This is the curse of being a beautiful man in our culture (powerful men experience a similar phenomenon)…they are rewarded for minimalist efforts in their personal dealings. People quite simply want to be near them and will put up with a lot, give them a lot, in order to hold that coveted status. I’ve seen it all many times before because I am a beautiful enough woman to attract these beautiful men.
This is also why I have been hesitant to date beautiful men in the past 6 years. They have the tendency to treat women (even the truly amazing one’s) as interchangeable and disposable without being consciously aware of it.
But, it's not the same for beautiful women. Not in this culture anyway. We’re perceived as arm candy, trophies, something to adorn one’s life with and the moment the shiny-ness factor wears off we’re traded in. That is, unless we happen to find ourselves a sweet and not-so-beautiful man that worships us and isn’t afraid to express his adoration and (hopefully) admiration. This is why I’ve tended to stick with ‘geeks’ as lovers. Beautiful women are not expected to be smart or funny or vulnerable and when we are, it’s to our detriment. We’re expected to look good and be made of Teflon. The moment we don’t look so good we must acquire other skills in order to remain valuable. The moment we’re no longer valuable is when the Teflon coating comes in handy.
As beautiful men age they become even more coveted, yet as beautiful women age they become more disposable (it seems to me anyway). Or perhaps we become furniture. Something that may need the occasional dusting off but otherwise is simply there to be of use.
feeling jaded and frustrated,
-K
The beautiful men I've met seem to have this self-perception that their mere presence is a gift to others that requires little effort on their part other than simply being there. This is the curse of being a beautiful man in our culture (powerful men experience a similar phenomenon)…they are rewarded for minimalist efforts in their personal dealings. People quite simply want to be near them and will put up with a lot, give them a lot, in order to hold that coveted status. I’ve seen it all many times before because I am a beautiful enough woman to attract these beautiful men.
This is also why I have been hesitant to date beautiful men in the past 6 years. They have the tendency to treat women (even the truly amazing one’s) as interchangeable and disposable without being consciously aware of it.
But, it's not the same for beautiful women. Not in this culture anyway. We’re perceived as arm candy, trophies, something to adorn one’s life with and the moment the shiny-ness factor wears off we’re traded in. That is, unless we happen to find ourselves a sweet and not-so-beautiful man that worships us and isn’t afraid to express his adoration and (hopefully) admiration. This is why I’ve tended to stick with ‘geeks’ as lovers. Beautiful women are not expected to be smart or funny or vulnerable and when we are, it’s to our detriment. We’re expected to look good and be made of Teflon. The moment we don’t look so good we must acquire other skills in order to remain valuable. The moment we’re no longer valuable is when the Teflon coating comes in handy.
As beautiful men age they become even more coveted, yet as beautiful women age they become more disposable (it seems to me anyway). Or perhaps we become furniture. Something that may need the occasional dusting off but otherwise is simply there to be of use.
feeling jaded and frustrated,
-K
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 3:33 PMI understand where your frustration comes from. It's brave of you to even bring this up because it's often perceived to be conceit.
Most of the beautiful men I have known had no idea they were beautiful. I don't know if this enhanced it or not but it always seemed tragic.
Perceptions of beauty are heavy issues for women and I have t say the worst of it came out when I worked in corporate. How dare you be beautiful, smart, resourceful and likable! Most of the other women hated me, especially when it was time to pick someone for promotion.
Lucky for me, I always liked the quirky guys. The ones that have beauty only I see.
I don't know if I agree with everything you're saying as concrete reality but there is definitely a specific dynamic to attractiveness is a social system that expects you to manipulate others because of it. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 3:45 PMThanks quel. I don't necessarily believe that all beautiful men are fully aware of their beauty, but they can't help but absorb the preferential treatment they're given....which then leads to that sense of over-privilege. Beautiful women, on the other hand, are often fully aware of their beauty but still suffer from an anemic level of self-confidence. In fact, some of the MOST beautiful women I've ever known were the least self-confident. I suppose some of this may even speak back to wild's post about the GGW sub-culture. The more attractive a female is the more two dimensional value we place on her physical beauty...or something like that.
-K -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 3:52 PMoh absolutely. men never line up to be next to beautiful women. models don't skate through life on their good looks. & women certainly never trade in men when they tire of them. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 4:04 PM"models don't skate through life on their good looks"
silly man...of course they do. That was never even up for debate. However, there is an expiration date for beautiful women. Not so for beautiful men.
-K -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 4:12 PMreally? you get turned on by a beautiful 85-year-old man?
we all have expiration dates.
yes, womens' is earlier. yes, it's unfair. but we all have one.
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 5:54 PMum, Paul Newman, Clint Eastwood, Robert Redford are still looking pretty damn good.. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 9:19 AMok, so there're exceptions to every rule.
what about 95 -year-old men? 105-year-old men?
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 6:10 PMum, Paul Newman, Clint Eastwood, Robert Redford are still looking pretty damn good..
~~~~~~~
l love you so much.
l've had a crush on Paul Newman for as long as l've known he was around. Rob too. There's also George Clooney and Harrison Ford.
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 7:37 PM>> However, there is an expiration date for beautiful women <<
Sadly, in general this is true. I for one find great beauty in women of all ages, My grandmother is 86 and quite radiant and beautiful. Of course very different than she was when she was 30, but still beautiful.
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 7:41 PMyeah, men get at least 25 more years than women before their
sell by date is up.. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, June 23, 2008 - 9:47 AMWA >> yeah, men get at least 25 more years than women before their sell by date is up.. <<
That just means they have 25 more years until they are more-or-less forced to grow up.
That is not necessarily an advantage.
-
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 6:27 PMmodels don't skate through life on their good looks.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Sure they do. Until they don't have their good looks anymore and realize that was their only marketable skill unless they like to beat up their personal assistants or get caught doing coke on someone's cellphone camera. l think a 'Where are they now?' show on supermodels would probably turn up some pretty sad stories.
l've had this 'curse of being beautiful' conversation several times, and quite recently. lf you are (by societal standards) unattractive, you deal with the burden of not having any choice about how you are viewed, and unfortunately, run into quite a few shitty dating circumstances as a result. But that doesn't mean it's all smooth sailing if you are goodlooking. As Apache and l pointed out in another thread, it's not uncommon to run across a man who is surprised that we are actually intelligent as well, and nothing sucks more than discovering that a guy you liked, by his very own statement, thought we were dumb in the first place. l know that over half of the men l am now friends with may or may not have ever spoken to me had l not been cute, and at least two of them knew who l was for a long time but didn't strike up a conversation because they were intimidated. l suppose a number of people think being intimidating is somehow a good quality, but it's not. And one man l dated in my early twenties told me that if he'd realized l actually had opinions about stuff he never would have asked me out. Yeah, he literally said that. Being goodlooking ain't all it's cracked up to be. Being unattractive sucks too. Either way, being belittled or otherwise brushed off because of your looks blows. l like the way l look; l'm confident about it. But it'd be nice if my brain stood out every so often, and because of my looks, l have to work twice as hard to prove my intelligence. That's just fucking weird. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 3:12 AMSo So glad I am ugly.
As an aside Leonard said this
Chelsea Hotel # 2
I remember you well in the Chelsea Hotel,
you were talking so brave and so sweet,
giving me head on the unmade bed,
while the limousines wait in the street.
Those were the reasons and that was New York,
we were running for the money and the flesh.
And that was called love for the workers in song
probably still is for those of them left.
Ah but you got away, didn't you babe,
you just turned your back on the crowd,
you got away, I never once heard you say,
I need you, I don't need you,
I need you, I don't need you
and all of that jiving around.
I remember you well in the Chelsea Hotel
you were famous, your heart was a legend.
You told me again you preferred handsome men
but for me you would make an exception.
And clenching your fist for the ones like us
who are oppressed by the figures of beauty,
you fixed yourself, you said, "Well never mind,
we are ugly but we have the music."
And then you got away, didn't you babe...
I don't mean to suggest that I loved you the best,
I can't keep track of each fallen robin.
I remember you well in the Chelsea Hotel,
that's all, I don't even think of you that often.
</end>
No Really I don't think of you often.
JSin
-
-
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, June 23, 2008 - 8:56 AMK >> This is also why I have been hesitant to date beautiful men in the past 6 years. They have the tendency to treat women (even the truly amazing one’s) as interchangeable and disposable without being consciously aware of it. <<
Aren’t all women truly amazing?
K >> as beautiful women age they become more disposable (it seems to me anyway). <<
Beautiful women don’t become more disposable as they age, they just lose whatever *advantages* they enjoyed from being beautiful. If they have been overly reliant on their looks to get by, then they are going to have some growing up to do when their looks fade. While that isn’t necessarily a bad thing, growing up is generally not pain free.
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, June 23, 2008 - 3:15 PMOh, sister. Tell me about it.
I feel like I have a lot to say about this but I don't know where to begin.
In my personal experience, an added detriment to being a beautiful woman, besides the basics that you've covered in your post is this: People have different expectations of your physicality. People will look at my face and have a moment of categorizing me into "the beautiful people" or something. They will make a bunch of assumptions, but the one I'm having the most trouble with lately is that they expect me to care about my looks more than other facets of my life. They'll notice that I don't shave my legs & pits, or that I have bit of a belly and I'm not thin. Or that there is a hole in my shirt. Or that I'm not wearing any makeup. Or that I don't bother growing out my hair and making it beautiful for them. And there's a sense that I'm supposed to be maximizing my beauty to fulfill some sort of desire that *they* have.
Meanwhile, inside I'm screaming, "I'm an artist, an activist, a writer, a lover, a philosopher. Stop looking at me. Start seeing me."
I have no idea why I just shared something so personal but there you have it. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, June 23, 2008 - 5:17 PMMammoth >> Stop looking at me. Start seeing me. <<
I am sorry that you have felt unseen. That is no fun.
I don't think that has much to do with beauty, however.
As someone who was born with an already expired sell by date, I can say that being ugly is no guarantee of being seen either. ;-) -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, June 23, 2008 - 5:26 PMsaddha, the reason I included that in my comment was because in the particular type of scenario I was talking about, it relates directly to my beautiful face.
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, June 23, 2008 - 6:25 PMI think it's about disengaging from the mainstream societal ideal of beauty completely, and defining beauty personally. I mean, the mainstream in general is just kind of silly, so it's not surprising that the version of beauty promoted within the mainstream would be youth-obsessed, misogynistic and exclusionary. Or that people who hop on the "I'm so beautiful. I'm a gift to all of you" train would be irritating and vapid. You can observe those dynamics but still not buy into them. If you reframe what you perceive as beautiful to your own individual taste, it really doesn't matter what anyone else says is or isn't beautiful.
To me, true beauty doesn't fade with age...it just deepens and evolves. I mean, Michelle Pfeiffer is 50 years old and has never looked better. But it definitely is an odd phenomenon when certain people have always gotten a lot of play for being beautiful. It does do something messed up to their personalities...in a way that they can say fairly mundane things, and they believe themselves to be so interesting and relevant...when in actuality, they're just getting attention because of their looks. Most celebrities fall into this category to me. They're a solipsistic yawnfest. I've always found it odd who gets labelled as a beauty by the mainstream and who doesn't...because some of the most beautiful people I know have never been billed as such and haven't gotten the recognition of their looks. I think it's just another way that mainstream values don't match up to my own. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, June 23, 2008 - 9:45 PM>>>I've always found it odd who gets labelled as a beauty by the mainstream and who doesn't
and yet, there are times when it all evens out. two celebrity females that immediately come to mind are sarah-jessica-parker and angelina-jolie (well, and barbra-streisand - but hell she even made a movie about it). both of these women are NOT beauties to my "eye" and probably never will be, but i have come to identify them as beautiful by their presentation and media-hype.
yes, you could say that im a misogynistic and exclusionary beauty purveyor - but i am definitely not youth-obsessed. oddly, i think that the two examples i gave are getting more beautiful as they age - like carol burnett, tina turner, or cher.
but yall are right overall - even tho id consider myself sexually bi/gay - i still find that my eye for beauty is much harsher when pointed at women than when pointed at men. however, this recent sets of generations have started to even out the playing field and men/boys are being objectified (particularly) in the gay-communities to pretty much the same degree as women have been for many many many generations... -
-
Unsu...
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 4:31 PM"i still find that my eye for beauty is much harsher when pointed at women than when pointed at men."
I'm a person who bestows the term "beautiful" very infrequently whether male or female. I find that society in general uses the term too liberally...and a lot of times is talking more about a person's stylized image than real beauty. You can't buy beauty...but of course, that sentiment wouldn't fly very well in a capitalist society that wants everyone to believe he/she can. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, June 25, 2008 - 6:02 AMWillow - "a lot of times is talking more about a person's stylized image than real beauty. You can't buy beauty...but of course, that sentiment wouldn't fly very well in a capitalist society that wants everyone to believe he/she can."
Totally, most people see the signifiers (or symbols) of "beauty" - their style of packaging - before they look closely at someone's natural aesthetic. Though I'd point out that you *can* actually buy aesthetic beauty - or the currently popular version of it - if you have a very good plastic surgeon. There are limits - but if you have cash, not that many. Though in reality all one really needs to attract people who are looking for a handbag or arm candy are the signifiers of beauty and social success - which you can also buy.
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 6:38 PMI'm a person who bestows the term "beautiful" very infrequently whether male or female. I find that society in general uses the term too liberally...and a lot of times is talking more about a person's stylized image than real beauty.
~~~~~~~~~~~
l'd be curious to know how and under what circumstances the word 'beautiful' was coined. l'm guessing, though, that it was meant to be a physical descriptive, not a character one, in which case, stylized image is precisely what's judged...not the depth of beauty you and many of the rest of us might see. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 8:02 AMali - regarding beauty and "stylized beauty" or signified beauty, I'd say there's a difference (to me at least). I guess for me it's the difference between natural and artificial beauty (though the vast majority of "natural" beauties look more beautiful with some grooming and adornment too...and most "natural" looks actually take some skill and artifice to create ;-) - or perhaps more accuately the difference between the raw material and the polished/sculpted object. Natural beauty is our genetic heritage, how symmetrical one's face is, the size of certain features, our body shape...all those things which we're hardwired to respond naturally. To me, artificial beauty is the social constructs, the accentuating and creating the illusion of certain naturally attractive features, display and the aura one gives off and so on. In some ways, I'm actually more of a fan of a well constructed beauty (to my taste obviously) than natural beauty, simply because of the intelligence, creativity and appreciation of aesthetics required to construct an aura of beauty that influences how people perceive them. Glamour, in its original sense, meant casting a spell over someone or an illusion - and glamorous beauty is still about weaving a spell and creating auras. Not that I don't enjoy and appreciate a naturally pretty or beautiful face too.
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 6:34 PMand yet, there are times when it all evens out. two celebrity females that immediately come to mind are sarah-jessica-parker and angelina-jolie
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SJP was voted the ugliest woman by some mens' magazine recently. You aren't the only one.
Ali,
who loooooooves Angelina and thinks she's beautiful but not because society told her to... -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 8:30 AMDid *anyone* EVER think SJP was some sort of Hollywood goddess or sex symbol? C'mon!!!! Not even women think she's beautiful, do they?
Now Angelina (who I also think is hot) is pretty much an extreme parody of fertile/nubile beauty and sexiness, much like Pamela Anderson (whom I also love, if only for being a cartoon and aware of it). -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 2:06 PMEven Angelina is nearing the end of her shelf life for the type of role you mentioned, "fertile/nubile beauty and sexiness". I saw her last night in 'Wanted' and those vivacious lips she once had now undulate from scene to scene depending upon when she'd had her last series of collagen injections. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 2:20 PMWTF Charles, she's 33.
and her lips have always been that way. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 2:30 PMYup, it's this type of criticism that women have to be subjected to all the time. I notice as well, that people seem to comment on a woman's weight and figure in public much more than they do of men's. Somehow, the way a woman looks is everyone's business.
I was once very sick from e. coli and couldn't eat for a week. When I went back to work, down to 105 lbs, everyone commented on how great I looked: customers, coworkers etc. "Really? Because I almost died last week!" was my reply. Even at the Dr's office, the nurse showed his own idea of what women should be like. When he weighed me at 105, i said "Oh, no..." and he replied :"Don't worry, your sandals add some weight." I was concerned that I was too thin and he thought I was concerned for weighing too much! -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 2:35 PMdamn
if that's the kind of reaction a woman of ~ 33 ~ gets
i better just order a wheelchair for my ancient 39 year old self...
*sigh*
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 4:12 PMSeemed to me there was a dramatic change in the size of her lips from scene to scene, and it caught my attention. No doubt Angelina is still a very attractive woman, but nearing her shelf life for the type of role she's been used to playing. It's sort of like picking out a peach at the market. Every once in a while you find the perfect peach - not too hard, not too ripe, the color and texture are perfect and it's as sweet and juicy as it can be. Sometimes at just the right time of year if you're lucky you'll even find one where the sugar has crystallized on the outside of the pit.
We all have that sweet spot in our development, our peak of power, when the energy of youth begins transforming itself into manhood and womanhood. And before you know it, its' gone - though certainly nothing to lose sleep over. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 4:19 PM>>>but nearing her shelf life for the type of role she's been used to playing<<<
and what roles are those, Charles?
and what roles is she nearing suitability for? -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 4:34 PMYOu know ,fuck that noise. A woman of 33 is no where near the end of any sort of shelf life. and I am kind of getting tired of everyone just accepting it as the way it is- women get this mysterious set of expiration dates that only come from the cultural bias against women who were no longer as fertile any more. Seriously, we got enough fertility, I don't think a woman's worth can honestly be judged on how often her ovaries work anymore.
So 20th century.
I just turned 38. I guess I should just go kill myself now cause I have a line or two under my eyes and my full lips are just a shade less full than they used to be at one time.
. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 5:20 PMI wouldn't do anything drastic just yet. I look at 38 as being a young woman. The fact is, I had coffee with a 96 year old this morning, and she's still as sharp as a tack.
I was referring to the entertainment industry, more specifically the movie business, and they keep their eyes open for very specific types of talent and genes. They look for stars, one in a millions. And over time they've been pretty consistent finding what they want. It is more the rule than the exception in that business, if a woman wants to extend their shelf life, she'll begin hacking herself up, and spend literally a fortune on cosmetic dentistry, skincare specialists, personal trainers and the like to keep that particular look, that flare. And many of them, unless they have some very fine-tuned talents or something else going for them, just fall off the radar. Frequently, that's the way it is in that business - they know what people are willing to pay for and they give it to them. It's a rough business (especially for women), and in many cases it's a question of whether you have the goods or you don't.
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 7:19 PMWell, I guess she'll move on in her career. I've never really found her to be a particularly talented character actor - so, I don't know what that means for her. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, June 30, 2008 - 8:10 PMOkay Charles, I get what you mean.
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 3, 2008 - 1:46 PMAngelina's not the best example of someone who's going to fall off the radar. Aside from the fact that she's still young, as long as she and Brad continue to add to their brood and contribute to global issues, they'll stay in the headlines, regardless of what acting work they're doing. Hollywood ain't even close to done with Angelina yet. l have a feeling that when Angelina tires of doing action movies, she'll move on to roles that demand more in terms of acting, and may end up surprising everyone. She already has a couple of acting awards under her belt.
And the lips are real. l know cuz l watched the True Hollywood Story. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Fri, July 4, 2008 - 12:02 AMYeah, she is one that has something going for her, but that has little to do with talent, and demanding roles require talent. Maybe she'll rise to the challenge; I hope she does.
Of course her lips are real, but swelling up and deflating from scene to scene seems to indicate a little help from her friends, and that's OK with me - just caught me eye. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, July 16, 2008 - 6:46 PM"Yeah, she is one that has something going for her, but that has little to do with talent, and demanding roles require talent."
Hmm. l thought she did an incredible job in Gia, and a damn good job in Girl, lnterrupted. But l also already pointed out that many of her roles don't require that kind of acting challenge, which makes sense when most assume she has no acting ability.
"Of course her lips are real, but swelling up and deflating from scene to scene seems to indicate a little help from her friends, and that's OK with me - just caught me eye."
Oh, come on. l saw the movie (after this conversation and your comments). l have no idea what you're talking about. l don't get it and l didn't see inflation happening. Are you just busy trying to make a point about actresses you don't like or approve of?
Ali,
who's not trying to start a fight about freakin actors and Hollywood, but still.... -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, July 16, 2008 - 7:40 PMI don't know if your post is enough for me to go ahead and watch the movie again, but maybe I should after reading what you wrote, as I'm curious to know if I'd still see what I thought I saw. I saw her in a quick clip on the news taken after she'd had her and Brad's twins, and I have to admit - those lips of her were popping out bigger than ever. It's not uncommon for film actresses to get collagen shots during the shooting of a film, and (as I said) there appeared to me some of that going on, but I guess it's remotely possible I may have been mistaken :-)
I didn't see either of the films you mentioned, and to a certain degree, I'm relying on longer-term memory, but if memory serves me correctly, I don't remember her holding down what I'd term roles that demanded a substantial degree of emotional depth - yet when I think about it, that might just not be who she is, and it's my own biases that are defining what I think talent or emotional depth really is. I'll have to think more about that.
That said, I still find her to be a very attractive woman. I think what I was trying to get at was that I've seen many female film stars sort of run into a stone wall at some point in their careers - a place where their natural beauty became less of a dominating factor in their careers. Maybe I was a little too judgmental concerning Angelina - I should only be so lucky. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, July 26, 2008 - 5:25 PMI didn't see either of the films you mentioned, and to a certain degree, I'm relying on longer-term memory, but if memory serves me correctly, I don't remember her holding down what I'd term roles that demanded a substantial degree of emotional depth
~~~~~~~~~
Both roles and movies l mentioned won her an acting award. That's why l recommend you see them. :)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 3:22 PMWillow >> I mean, the mainstream in general is just kind of silly, so it's not surprising that the version of beauty promoted within the mainstream would be youth-obsessed, misogynistic and exclusionary. <<
Not to mention commercialized, commoditized, and adolescent, and yet there do seem to be a lot of people who buy into it, mostly to their own detriment I would guess.
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 7:21 AMK, you obviously have never been a man who dated women! If you had, you'd know that this same tendency is just as rampant amongst stereotypically attractive women. Your point about aging not withstanding (dudes just get distinguished with age, lol), women are just as bad about it as men.
Of course, that was only an issue for me when I was in highschool; I likes me a curvy nerd lady nowadays.
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 8:20 AM-k - My sympathies if you've been treated badly...don't blame him because he's beautiful! ;-) ....um, seriously, jerks come in ugly and pretty flavors. Having dated some exceptionally beautiful men over the years (beautiful in the "model" kinda sense, not just my subjective estimation) my experience with beautiful men has been kind of different than yours (much more positive by the sound of it). Shiny beautiful people - whether it's innate physical beauty or just working all of today's signifiers of superficial beauty - can get away with all kinds of things uglier grungy people can't (or for longer than ugly people), as well as getting more unwanted attention.
And the end of the day though, being "too beautiful" is an easily remedied problem. It's not like one can't get rid of "beautiful" if it's really a burden or tone it down. Though it's worth knowing that people tend to actually attribute more intelligence to beautiful people than ugly ones, more honesty (ugly people tend to be viewed as being dishonest) and so on. Sure some people will sell their mother to stand next to a beautiful person in the hopes it will rub off or to "own" them like they would a new sports car or designer handbag - but they're people who are jerks to everyone not just beautiful women (or men).
I think a lot of attractive women (and men) don't actually realize the privileges and little extras they receive simply because they're young and attractive. As women age they're not attractive to as many men - particularly young ones (and this is a vast generalization) - so they lose a power/privilege they took for granted. That said, I've known objectively not beautiful people who pull like crazy because they're just too damn sexy. I know more and more women in their 50s and even 60s who are more beautiful and desirable than some 20 year olds, so I'm not convinced it's all just about the sands of time really anymore. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 9:55 AMShiny beautiful people - whether it's innate physical beauty or just working all of today's signifiers of superficial beauty - can get away with all kinds of things uglier grungy people can't (or for longer than ugly people), as well as getting more unwanted attention.
Just to flesh out what I wrote.... I've seen "beautiful" people get away with stuff with strangers much more often than people who know them (haven't we all met someone we initially find beautiful who becomes increasingly physically ugly to our eyes as their interior ugly/stupid shines through?) except when the relationship/attraction is based solely on someone being arm candy. Hell, looking back from this vantage point I have to acknowledge I probably got quite a few breaks when I was younger because someone found me attractive (even though I thought it was all about my individuality, style and wit at the time). I'm aware of the privileges I still get when I'm signifying to the world that I'm "beautiful". The reality is that most of us are friendlier and more generous with people we want to get to know or be associated with - whether we're attracted to the other person's beauty, brains, style, humour, power, smell or whatever. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 10:46 AMFifi,
I have to say this is what people always say if there is a complaint about the treatment one gets for being attractive. The bottom line is, each role has its burden, but this one seems like it can't be talked about without being perceived as ungrateful. The truth is, one cannot know what it's like to be the other and invalidating someone's feelings about their experience does no one any good.
Everyone can complain without provocation, about the 'beautiful people', but if you're considered to be one of them, you're not allowed to complain, I guess. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 11:55 AMJust to clarify, the man that inspired my initial post is not a jerk. He is beautiful inside and out. Kind, giving, generous and sweetly supportive to all of his friends, including me, his girlfriend. He's also an amazing papa.
My issue has to do with the social conditioning via preferential treatment he's received for his entire life due to his movie-star good looks as well as his genuinely sweet nature. It's not that he's ever consciously perceived women as disposable, but rather that he's had so many of them falling at his proverbial feet just for the chance to bask in his warm glow. He seems almost oblivious to the effect he has on people...or at least oblivious as to why. It's been an interesting case study for me. At no point does his love for me diminish due to the constant barrage of women (and a few men) that seem to so desperately want to participate in his life in some way. And he doesn't experience jealousy when he notices that I, too, might be receiving some preferential treatment. Though, he definitely has my back when I receive negative treatment from others due to what I look like.
And there is really no way for hims to see 'the other side' of what living life as a non-beautiful is like. Whereas I HAVE had a few run-in's with this. After giving birth to my twins I was pretty big for a few years. I also have a rare blood disorder that sometimes manifests itself by causing lots and lots of tiny bruises all over my extremities and if I happen t be wearing shorts, t-shirts or a bathing suit people politely (and sometimes not so politely) keep a great distance cuz for all they know I could be a leper. I also had to go through a few rounds of chemo about a decade ago and lost most of my hair. I'm fine now and I have a full head of hair again, but I do know something about how it feels, and how folks treat ya when you're not so good looking.
Anyway, now that I am once again included among the ranks of the beautiful, I am almost hyper-aware of the difference. Not just the difference between how I am treated when beautiful as compared to not-so-beautiful, but also how beautiful men are treated so differently than beautiful women. A case in point: the last time I went to visit my sweetie I got a flat tire. I walked into 2 garages to get an estimate of how much $ and time it might take to get it repaired or purchase a new/used replacement tire. The lowest I was quoted was $85 and a few hours, perhaps not ready til the next day. My sweetie walked into one shop and the female co-owner (wife of owner) smiled real big and said, we can do this for $25, and would be ready in 10 minutes. She flirted with him shamelessly the whole time and then once she saw ME she became rather cold and crusty...but only to me.
Then we went to grab a bite to eat. The place we went to was packed and so I put us on their waiting list while my sweetie parked the motorcycle. He came in and the hostess immediately asked him how many people would he be dining with and would he prefer a window seat or the sushi bar. I had to take a brief leave to the loo so she didn't realize that we were together. I came out and he found me and we had a great table. My own name was still about 20 minutes down the seating list.
He lives by the philosophy of 'ask and ye shall receive' because for him it's never been anything but that. It's like a little backpack of privilege he somewhat unknowingly carries everywhere he goes. And yes, it IS different for women! Beautiful women may also receive preferential treatment but it's often couple with jealousy, feelings of intimidation or outright threat and a whole helluva lot of condescension. Perhaps as we age that condescension lessons and we're not so much of a perceived threat. Beautiful men, in my experience anyway, don't suffer from outright patronization and whatever threat they may pose is often only an issue when in bar scenes with drunken men that don't want them stealing their thunder, so to speak.
-K -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 3:05 PMK,
Reading what you have written, I imagine that you would like to be treated as well as your BF apparently is. Would you be willing to consider the possibility that his being well treated has more to do with his sensitivity to and consideration for others, than with his being a man? -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 7:00 PMReading what you have written, I imagine that you would like to be treated as well as your BF apparently is. Would you be willing to consider the possibility that his being well treated has more to do with his sensitivity to and consideration for others, than with his being a man?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wow, what an asshole you are. What place do you have to assume K has a shitty personality based on what tiny bit you know of her here? Wake up, dude. This is the way of the world. Perceptions of men and women differ regardless of their looks, and they also differ BECAUSE of them. lf you're assuming based on a couple of posts that it's because her boyfriend must just be nicer, you're either on another planet, or you're a sexist. l'd bet on both, personally.
l'm surprised nobody else noticed or commented on such a nasty and unsubstantiated suggestion.
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, June 25, 2008 - 7:34 AM-K - Thanks for filling in your story - I can see what you're getting at more clearly and sorry for calling your man a jerk! "a little backpack of privilege" - nicely written and exactly what I was trying to get at. I wasn't trying to diminish the burden of the backpack, just point out that it's still stuffed with privileges (no matter one's gender). Have you talked to your man about what you've observed? I'd suspect that he's blissfully ignorant of much of what transpires around him.
On the downside of being a beautiful man, most of the really, really beautiful men I know had to deal with a lot of sexual attention from adult men during adolescence (often confusing and unwanted, sometimes very aggressive). That said, this is one of the downsides of being socially desirable in a society that elevates beauty above other qualities.
I think some of the differences in respect/privilege you're speaking about have less to do with beauty and more to do with gender. Older men tend to be regarded as more desirable by women than older women are by men in general (though it seems as if some of these things are shifting and Americans are particularly youth obsessed). If an older woman rocking hundreds of thousands in designer gear showed up and asked for a table in an upscale restaurant she'd be given a really good one too - wealth trumps beauty most of the time since it's easy enough to decorate with pretty young things if one's wealthy (getting back to the beautiful people as objects idea).
I'd say just enjoy the privileges your boyfriend brings with him (and send him to get your car fixed! ;-) As for jealous and bitter women, I say "whatever!". Seriously, why not be gracious to the needy? After all, if we're the hot woman who's got a hot boyfriend (or whatever), why stoop to engaging in someone else's pettiness when there's no competition other than in their mind unless we play into it? (Not saying you engage in pettiness! I'm trying to make more of a generalization about situations where someone's set themselves up as our competition when there is no competition unless we engage in it.) -
-
Unsu...
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, June 25, 2008 - 8:18 AMUm, you can now scratch everything I said about his being beautiful on the inside as well.
I had a few phone calls last night that have pretty much caused me to lose complete respect and admiration for this man. At this point, I hope his looks can carry him along successfully because his lack of character and inability to be honest about damn near anything isn't going to help...well, unless he goes into politics (which has been on the table for a few years, believe it or not).
Beautiful or not, he's no longer a part of my equation. And I believe that the hundreds of other that have invested their time, effort, energy and money into ths biz we have ought to be given full disclosure as well. He's fucked up pretty big this time and it will affect many, many people if he doesn't grow the fuck up and find a way to make this right.
-K
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, June 25, 2008 - 9:09 AM>> he's no longer a part of my equation. <<
Sorry to hear this K, as he seemed to make you so happy there for a while. Unfortunate when people don't turn out to be who they seem to be... :(
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, June 25, 2008 - 9:09 AM-K - Sorry to hear that things have played out this way for you. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, June 26, 2008 - 12:43 PMuhm - is it just me? or has this played out fairly quickly? maybe we are just looking too closely at the inside-dynamics of the "-k and BG" (beautiful guy) scene - but i always thought that relationships ought to have a longer time-scale involved...
i hope you (k) are ok and whether you and BG have a "future" or not, that you are (or end up) happy. i guess this situation reminds me that part of the "curse of beauty" can be its fleeting nature... both the inside-beauty and the outside-beauty.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 12:09 PMquel - I'm not saying that beautiful people don't have a right to complain or that being attractive doesn't have a downside. Rich people have a right to complain too, being rich has all kinds of downsides (that the non-rich tend not to see). It was once fashionable to complain about the "White Man's Burden" too but I find it a bit hard to have sympathy for that historical complaint. Poor people, the rich, geniuses, idiots , the weak and the powerful - we all have our own burdens and certain prejudices or stereotypes to contend with. Everyone has a right to complain or feel sorry for themselves when they feel they're not being treated fairly, just like everyone else has a right to react how they see fit.
Anyway, my main point was to say that my personal experiences with beautiful men have been quite different than -k's so it's not something that's inherently just about beautiful men but perhaps to do with some other factor than just being beautiful. If it's something that's causing -k some anguish (and if she wants to change it) then she may need to look at what else is going on with herself, the person and/or the dynamic, apart from just seeing it as being a by-product of their beauty (though maybe it is in the circles she travels in or where she lives, certainly some worlds I travel in reward and value beauty and possessions - pretty people being just another bling to collect - over other things but then some circles and cultures are just like that).
Having listened to a lot of beautiful people I love complain over the years and had my own complaints about people feeling like they can just treat someone a certain way because they find them attractive, I have genuine empathy for the difficulties that can come with being beautiful, rich or somehow socially privileged. It's just good to keep one's pretty feet on the ground and to also recognize that the blessings are generally bigger than the burden when it comes to beauty, wealth and power. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 3:24 PMFifi,
For what it's worth, I find myself in agreement with almost everything you have said in this thread. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 7:03 PMFor what it's worth, I find myself in agreement with almost everything you have said in this thread.
~~~~~~~~~~
l'm willing to bet that whatever she's said isn't quite what you said, however. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, June 29, 2008 - 8:22 AMali - Yeah, I figured saddha/MrLovingKindness jumped in because he was interested in being insulting to a woman (again). As for "agreeing" with me, I suspect he was just hoping to stir up shit and trying to pretend our thoughts and feelings on the matter are aligned so me and -k would get ugly with each (heh, about beauty). I figured it just wasn't worth responding to saddha/MrLo since he was playing the world's smallest violin for himself, he seems to be a bit bitter and martyred about beautiful people and women in particular.
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 7:06 PMAnd when all that fails to quote Red Green
"If they don't find ya handsome they best find ya handy"
On another side of it, one of the downsides of being a beautiful man, which I am not, I have seen more than one beaten to a pulp, a couple scarred and most accused of partaking in allegedly reprehensible acts with others of their own gender.
I have not seen a lot of inter gender violence levied against women.
JSin -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 7:50 PMWomen don't beat each other up over beauty (as often, anyway), but they can get downright evil with their words and manipulations. Some things jealous women do to one another can ruin lives, careers and reputations.
I've had sugar put in my gas tank because a girl liked a man who was interested in me. She hated that he gave me his attention. I have been accused of all manner of unethical things at my previous corporate job because my male employees had crushes on me. Some of the women got pissed off and a former assistant was angry that I wasn't attracted to him. He told a friend of mine he was sure he would be able to bed me, and when that dream was shattered, he launched a vendetta to get me fired. I guess the upside of being unattractive is that you don't have to deal with that bullshit... and why should I make myself look less attractive so assholes won;t show their own insecurities? I'm not going to straighten my hair to make better money in mainstream society either. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 7:59 PMi have some similar stories myself, quel..
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 9:53 PMI have definitely been witness to the types of behaviors you describe quel. Never was implying or stating it does not happen. Where as women seem to get catty ect for some reason men get violent and or disfiguring. Neither is right and personally think people do need to get the fuck over their insecurities.
JSin
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 7:57 PMOh yeah, Fifi?! Let's take it out back!
Really, I didn't mean to imply you were being harsh or anything.... or that everything K experiences isn't somehow related to her on actions somehow... but comparing the downside of being an attractive women in a society that already does not value them as equals is not comparable to the "White Man's Burden" at all. If women were seen as equals, it would be less likely that looks would need to be used to gain any advantages. Too often, attractive women are not taken seriously for their other attributes, esp those that do not rely on looks alone. I have often heard comments about my grades being attributed to a perception that a professor found me attractive. What kind of malarky is that? I worked hard for the grades and knowledge and value that more than my looks because it fulfills ME. I certainly never flirt with these men and am hesitant to talk to a professor I think is eyeing me up. The worst part is dealing with the jealousy of those who have no need to be. Those words hurt... and sometimes people like to believe them. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, June 25, 2008 - 6:57 AMOh yeah quel...you wanna play it like that.....Girl fight!!!!!!! Male fantasy alert! Beautiful women fighting! *hands quel a pillow since this is a retro fantasy*
Jealous people will always attribute your (or my or someone else's) success to something other than brains or hard work. People see something they want, they think it's unfair you (or I) have it and they don't, they attribute it to something outside of their power (the other person got it because they're beautiful, they're rich, they're friends with someone, etc). Of course, there *are* advantages and privileges that our society gives certain people - attractive people do get an easier time of it (which is why it's worth making oneself attractive, you don't actually have to be "beautiful" just look like you are) and there are doors that open when one is rich or educated at a certain school, etc. Whether the beautiful person consciously panders or uses their beauty to manipulate outcomes makes little difference ultimately since the person on the receiving end is the one being influenced and it has more to do with them than the beautiful person. Anything one stands out for will be the thing that also garners envy from others, particularly if it's something that innately holds social power - such as being beautiful or rich. People's jealousy essentially *comes* from their own unfulfilled needs and insecurities so for them, for whatever reason, there's a need to compete (a stupid need in my opinion but obviously important to the person feeling competitive).
I'd say that being beautiful is very much like being rich - both are forms of social power that one can work for or inherit, both are things held up as the apex of success and power in our society, both are things that even those who have want more of (there's never, ever enough and always someone richer or more beautiful!), both are things that give privileges that are automatic and taken for granted if one's born rich or beautiful, both can be burdens and destructive if not managed well (and if mistaken for substance not surface).
It happens that WOMEN aren't taken seriously for their non-physical attributes in professional and academic environments. One doesn't have to be beautiful or even obviously sexy to face this kind of discrimination. Envious and competitive people find other ways to diminish less attractive women who get great grades or excel too - often by pointing out that they're not classically beautiful or are a geek. There seems to be a somewhat similar dynamic in male culture between jocks and geeks/swats - the brains vs beauty dichotomy where it's considered unfair/unthinkable/undesirable for someone to be both brainy and beautiful, to be intellectual and sensual, to be a swat and a slut.
It's also worth mentioning that our society sells and completely runs on the idea that we all will be infinitely happy if we attain beauty and/or wealth, if one possesses what is desired and advertised as desirable. It's why there's never enough money or plastic surgery because people are looking for the cure for their existential malaise in the wrong places - a superficial bandage for a very deep need for meaning and purpose in our lives. So, it's kind of to be expected that anyone who buys into that paradigm will be resentful (or filled with vengeful glee) if the rich and beautiful aren't playing their role and fulfilling the social promise. You'll notice that people who have found meaning in their life and are good with who they are don't really give a rat's ass about this kind of thing, so it's really not worth sweating the resentments of petty people. Just my opinion, I *do* think it is worth being aware of the privileges as well as the burdens that come along with being beautiful simply because we're always aware of the downside and what we don't like about something but we're often unconscious of the upside and privileges since they're just how we're used to being treated. It allows us to be conscious of the experiences of others who may not have been as lucky in the birth lottery and have a realistic appreciation for both sides of the coin.
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 6:47 PMI have to say this is what people always say if there is a complaint about the treatment one gets for being attractive. The bottom line is, each role has its burden, but this one seems like it can't be talked about without being perceived as ungrateful.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Amen, and thank you. Sometimes l'd take not being objectified over the current alternative. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 6:48 PMdouble amen, and thank you.
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, June 30, 2008 - 7:47 AM"I have to say this is what people always say if there is a complaint about the treatment one gets for being attractive. The bottom line is, each role has its burden, but this one seems like it can't be talked about without being perceived as ungrateful.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Amen, and thank you. Sometimes l'd take not being objectified over the current alternative."
You wouldn't believe the shit I get when I apply this same concept to being male. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 3, 2008 - 1:53 PMl would, unfortunately. l can't imagine it's any easier. Out of curiosity, what's your experience from a male perspective? -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, July 7, 2008 - 2:57 PM"l would, unfortunately. l can't imagine it's any easier. Out of curiosity, what's your experience from a male perspective?"
So if you look at the power structure in America, both politcally and economically, it's white males that are running things on the whole (insert boilerplate lingo covering my ass about women and people of color holding positions of power here). I know being a white male has its advantages; I have never been racially profiled, for instance, and I got a home loan on my first try. But in a culture (or perhaps it's a subcultural tree that keeps me from seeing the forest?) where it's common and indeed expected to rail against the power structure, people make silly assumptions about what it's like to be a white guy.
I guess people assume that my life is like that episode of Saturday Night Live where Eddie Murphy goes undercover as a white guy. But I still have to bust my ass at a job, commute 90 minutes a day, pay my bills, etc. etc. On more than one occasion I have not been accused, per se, but notified that I couldn't understand somebody else's plight because I'm a white male. And while there may be very rare circumstances in which this is a true assesment, nine out of ten times I'll warrant that if you give me a chance, I can probably see to the heart of the issue and comiserate or empathize. I think this basic assumption that you can't understand somebody else's pain because you're different from them hardens people to whatever issue is at hand. Who the fuck does that help?
Then there's the whole list of shit men of pretty much an race have to deal with. I'm still trying to convince my wife that when she talks shit to somebody there is almost no chance of her getting in a fight because it is *I* who will end up in a physical altercation as a result of *her* actions. Even for as emotionally progressed as we may think Americans are, men still typically bare the responibility of being the emotionally stable, semi-stoic ones. That's a pain in the ass, too. When something shitty happens in our life, my wife gets the luxury of crying and freaking out while I "man up", decide that I'll set my emotions aside and worry about how I feel later, and make sure everything is under control. If you look at this in the context of a single issue it may not seem like a big deal. But having the responsibility to do this every time something happens can be brutal, especially when dealing with a series of unfortunate events in a small timeframe. Ironically, we're expected to maintain this level of conditioning *while still being expected to open up and explore our feelings*.
Ok, I'm on the brink of rambling so I'll wrap this up. But I think what will best serve our culture is for everybody to remember that very few, if any of us at all, have a very simple, carefree life. Everybody's got their burdens to deal with and they aren't negated by somebody else's burdens. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, July 7, 2008 - 3:21 PMEverybody's got their burdens to deal with and they aren't negated by somebody else's burdens.
amen.
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Mon, July 7, 2008 - 3:22 PMJosh - "I think what will best serve our culture is for everybody to remember that very few, if any of us at all, have a very simple, carefree life. Everybody's got their burdens to deal with and they aren't negated by somebody else's burdens."
Great post.
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, July 16, 2008 - 7:01 PM"I guess people assume that my life is like that episode of Saturday Night Live where Eddie Murphy goes undercover as a white guy. But I still have to bust my ass at a job, commute 90 minutes a day, pay my bills, etc. etc. On more than one occasion I have not been accused, per se, but notified that I couldn't understand somebody else's plight because I'm a white male. And while there may be very rare circumstances in which this is a true assesment, nine out of ten times I'll warrant that if you give me a chance, I can probably see to the heart of the issue and commiserate or empathize. I think this basic assumption that you can't understand somebody else's pain because you're different from them hardens people to whatever issue is at hand. Who the fuck does that help?"
l agree. l will say l think that, unfortunately, generally speaking, the white male is the least acquainted with professional and social troubles. He may experience them, sure, but he doesn't automatically compare them to others' situations, at least not when they happen. lt's not his inclination because he's generally fairly well off in comparison. This isn't insult. lt's fact. As you say, however, that gives him no reason to disbelieve or misunderstand what anyone else is going through. Assuming he does is a disservice.
"Then there's the whole list of shit men of pretty much an race have to deal with. I'm still trying to convince my wife that when she talks shit to somebody there is almost no chance of her getting in a fight because it is *I* who will end up in a physical altercation as a result of *her* actions. "
Really? Why would you get involved in an altercation that is entirely your wife's doing? Tell me she doesn't expect you to simply put your dignity on the line when she's offended by some dumbass.
"Even for as emotionally progressed as we may think Americans are, men still typically bare the responsibility of being the emotionally stable, semi-stoic ones. That's a pain in the ass, too."
THAT l get. l see no reason you are expected to be this way. Unless you choose to.
"When something shitty happens in our life, my wife gets the luxury of crying and freaking out while I "man up", decide that I'll set my emotions aside and worry about how I feel later, and make sure everything is under control. If you look at this in the context of a single issue it may not seem like a big deal. But having the responsibility to do this every time something happens can be brutal, especially when dealing with a series of unfortunate events in a small timeframe. Ironically, we're expected to maintain this level of conditioning *while still being expected to open up and explore our feelings*."
Wow. Thanks for sharing this. l know it's not typical for you to open up and share this kind of shit, so that's part of it, but l think it's something women need to hear and be aware of. This is a big part of why l spend time defending the men in this society.
"Ok, I'm on the brink of rambling so I'll wrap this up. But I think what will best serve our culture is for everybody to remember that very few, if any of us at all, have a very simple, carefree life. Everybody's got their burdens to deal with and they aren't negated by somebody else's burdens."
l'll give you a full 'amen' on that. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 17, 2008 - 7:54 AM"Really? Why would you get involved in an altercation that is entirely your wife's doing? Tell me she doesn't expect you to simply put your dignity on the line when she's offended by some dumbass."
She does it very rarely because neither of us are particularly inclined towards conflict. But yes, of course I would stand up for my wife. Every time. We can discuss later whether or not she was in the right but as far as I'm concerned anybody wanting to do her harm will always be on the wrong side. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, July 26, 2008 - 5:28 PMe does it very rarely because neither of us are particularly inclined towards conflict. But yes, of course I would stand up for my wife. Every time. We can discuss later whether or not she was in the right but as far as I'm concerned anybody wanting to do her harm will always be on the wrong side.
~~~~~~~
l certainly understand that. Thanks so much for sharing, Josh.
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 17, 2008 - 8:31 AM<<When something shitty happens in our life, my wife gets the luxury of crying and freaking out while I "man up", decide that I'll set my emotions aside and worry about how I feel later, and make sure everything is under control.>>
Your posts say that you are a wise, thinking man, Josh - I agree with most of what you said, but that snippet caught my attention. I'm wondering if that's a generational thing, or a product of the environment one is raised in. I've been in long-term relationships with various men who were raised in single-mother households, and I found that *I* was the one who was expected to make sure everything was under control. I got the luxury of crying, freaking out, and then sucking it up and dealing with it. With a more-or-less supportive audience.
I even saw this in play in my own family growing up...my father was also raised by a single mom, and although my family was pretty traditional ... mom stayed home, dad brought home the paycheck ... it was still my mother who ran the household, dealt with crises, kept the finances in working order, etc etc ... not because my father wasn't a capable and brilliant man, but because he was okay with her taking those things on.
Maybe I just never witnessed the dominant paradigm in action, though. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 17, 2008 - 9:14 AM"I've been in long-term relationships with various men who were raised in single-mother households, and I found that *I* was the one who was expected to make sure everything was under control."
That's interesting: Although my mom remarried when I was eight, my stepdad was obviously not comfortable trying to take on a parental role with somebody else's kid. He also could not relate to me; he was a farm boy and a country-type dude and I was a massive nerd so we didn't have a lot in common. That's not to say he didn't care about me and I understand how wierd that must have been for him. But my point is that I am essentially still the product of a single mother in most ways.
So I don't know if it's generational, or if the boys you dated who were raised only by their mothers weren't paying attention to what their moms were doing to keep the family going. I guess that could be generational too, but I'm only 30 years old; I think I'm part of the generations people have been complaining about for the last few years. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 17, 2008 - 9:49 AM<<I'm only 30 years old; I think I'm part of the generations people have been complaining about for the last few years>>
lol...i took you to be older...see what i get for not paying attention? shame on me!
nah, that's my generation too. maybe you're just a lot more functional than some of the guys i've dated. or maybe it's just that different people notice and/or take responsibility for different things.
as much as i love discussing and thinking about the effect that the larger cultural picture has on individual action, i've really come to believe that *The Dominant Paradigm* that everyone (including me!) likes to complain about...really has less effect on our individual actions than we think it does.
not that there aren't all kinds of stereotypes and cultural baggage to drop on the whole, but there are a lot more factors to personal development.
hmmm...off to think some more :-) -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 17, 2008 - 11:14 AM"i've really come to believe that *The Dominant Paradigm* that everyone (including me!) likes to complain about...really has less effect on our individual actions than we think it does."
Aaaah, it's so refreshing to hear peeps say things like this. It's the opposite train of thought that got us fucked up kids with fucked up parents who won't take responsibility for fucking up their kids. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 17, 2008 - 11:40 AMA-fucking-men.
The one thing I really hope to instill in my sons is a sense of personal goddamn responsibility and straight-up hard work. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Fri, July 18, 2008 - 2:45 AM<,But yes, of course I would stand up for my wife. Every time. We can discuss later whether or not she was in the right but as far as I'm concerned anybody wanting to do her harm will always be on the wrong side.>>
Cant believe no one comment on this with approval, support or something.
And I am not sure what to say about it - except I read it and thought it is exactly as it should be.
And that it reminds me of something a History Teacher said in school - that being married meant having always to be on your partners side when in public. Not matter what.
Maybe that's why i have never married :)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Fri, July 4, 2008 - 1:35 PM"As beautiful men age they become even more coveted, yet as beautiful women age they become more disposable (it seems to me anyway). Or perhaps we become furniture. Something that may need the occasional dusting off but otherwise is simply there to be of use."
This is just a function of evolutionary biology. Women are most attractive to men when they are most fertile & healthy (in their prime) -- when they are able to bear children. Men are programmed biologically to feel this way, in order to promote the proliferation of our species. This is a large part of why our species continues to exist (for now), rather than representing an evolutionary cul-de-sac. It would do our species little good if most men preferred post-menopausal women.
Men, on the other hand, are more attractive to most women after they have acquired enough wealth and wisdom to provide effectively and reliably for a child/family. This remains the case even if the woman has no desire for children/family, it's simply the way most of us are wired. I say this as a younger man who has been repeatedly left for older men. It certainly did not seem "fair" to me, but it is what it is. And I think we all have seen countless aging women left for younger, hotter women. It's just the nature of the beast.
As women pass their prime, of course they acquire different skills to remain socially viable -- this is the way it has been throughout history. And when men are younger, they have traditionally been taken advantage of in their own ways, such as being sent to fight/die in wars, and generally being treated coldly and without compassion. The rites of manhood generally involve swallowing extreme amounts of inner pain. We are unable to play the victim, unlike women who are encouraged to do so.
I think it's a somewhat fair trade -- a beautiful young woman can have men at her beck and call, but she gradually loses this ability as she ages. A young man may be thought of as a menace when his hormones are raging, but as he mellows and matures his ability to attract a prime woman (generally) is enhanced. A man's stock will typically rise as he ages, whereas a woman's stock will usually decline after the peak years of her fertility. To complain about all of this is merely to bemoan the passage of time and the nature of humanity.
Of course you can look beyond this to more of a "soul" level, but I don't think that is what is being discussed in the OP. I certainly think there is an ethereal, non-biological element to beauty as well, but the physical hard-wired element is difficult to deny. You can blame the culture for this all you want, but I think it is a more fundamental human component that has, by and large, transcended most/all human cultures. It's nice to think we could all rise above it, but I don't think there is much evidence we humans are (for the most part) capable of overcoming our own biology. The limitations of humanity are apparent in many areas other than sexuality & beauty.
I'm not saying any of this to advocate traditional gender roles -- I think we are all free to do whatever we want, and anything we can manage as individuals is fine & dandy. Many people have strong soul connections with each other and gain great joy from remaining eternally faithful/loyal even as they age. But this is the exception, not the rule. I do think a lot of would-be social engineers have a Utopian vision of what the future ought to be, and that vision is far from realistic. As I like to say, we can only work with what we've got, because that's simply the reality of the situation. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, July 5, 2008 - 12:18 PMwell said, nicely worded, and yet... for some reason it doesnt strike me as honest... why not - it is the "truth" as far as i can tell... i would (and could?) have said something similar and absolutely meant it for my honest (and even, dare i say extreme) truth.
in a bit of irony, i am just left with a "quandary" (ooph, spelling) of what has caused me to start typing right now... maybe i should go wake up - it was a long day/night for the 4th... nothing personal - just in a weird mood i guess...
oddly, one of my tasks for this weekend is to go color my hair - i hate all the gray. distinguished, my ass ! id rather look younger (and, _I_ feel, more beautiful)... go figure... -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, July 9, 2008 - 6:47 PMHah, it's so unfair that young men get left for older men..... I think it's unfair to women in general that men at least get their turn to become that distinguished gentleman, as well as enjoy their youthful looking days, having fun with the college girls/older tigers.
Women, on the other hand, get one chance.
It's true that the fertility of women is short lived, men can have children at age 84+.
I maybe, (tongue-in-cheek at age 33,) should trade in my 28 yr. old husband for a 53 yr. old, maybe that would make a pair that could last "'till death do us part." -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, July 9, 2008 - 6:53 PMI just thought of a better idea, since I'm bi-sexual by nature, I'll just become a full blown lesbian when I'm tossed out by men :P It seems as though I may have plenty of lonely, same situation, older women to find comfort in.
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, July 9, 2008 - 6:59 PMYeah Tinkles, that whole argument above you really just trivializes the dilemmas of being an aging woman.
I have never met a young man that was left for an older one that didn't have access to another young women waiting in the wings. It's not so for an older woman who is left for a younger one.
Saying that complaining about it is just complaining against natural processes (and is somehow invalidated) is like saying that complaining about sexism is just complaining about social evolution. Discontent changes paradigms.
Thank Goddess for young men who are into older women. I have found that older men aren't any more reliable, they're just more wrinkly and get tired too fast during sex. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, July 16, 2008 - 7:25 PM"I have never met a young man that was left for an older one that didn't have access to another young women waiting in the wings."
Uhhh, they all have "access". That doesn't mean there are young women who are ready and waiting.
"Thank Goddess for young men who are into older women. I have found that older men aren't any more reliable, they're just more wrinkly and get tired too fast during sex."
While that's just hilarious because l know what you're saying, it sounds like you're saying you prefer the young men, as though they have something new to offer or are somehow smarter for being with older women. l'm not sure l agree with that premise. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 17, 2008 - 2:21 PMWhere do you get that, Ali? I'm pretty straight forward and I don't believe I said younger men are at all smarter. I just think it's a counter experience to the former. It was tongue-in-cheek. It was a physical premise.
I actually have no preference in that way. I like guys for very cerebral reasons. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, July 26, 2008 - 5:33 PM"Thank Goddess for young men who are into older women. I have found that older men aren't any more reliable, they're just more wrinkly and get tired too fast during sex."
"Where do you get that, Ali? I'm pretty straight forward and I don't believe I said younger men are at all smarter."
You didn't. lt just seemed an interesting statement. Why thank Goddess for young men into older women? l understand now it was a physical point, but it just seemed off as a statement alone.
-
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 10, 2008 - 5:07 AMTinkles - Men like to think they're going full speed until their 70s but a new study just confirmed that men's fertility drops around 35 and their sperm becomes less volatile and increasingly weak and damaged with age (old sperm is more likely to cause miscarriages and birth defects, just like old eggs). Really, while old men may still be able to impregnate a woman they're not actually biologically desirable in terms of reproducing. I suspect the old man/young girl thing has more to do with history, economics/power, social conventions and women being chattel than it does with any great desire from most young women to sleep with wrinkly, no longer virile, old men. Apart from the odd girl with a daddy issue here and there. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 10, 2008 - 11:22 AMI had a friend last night say to me: "There are no hot old men. When they get naked, they're just old men." Ha!
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 10, 2008 - 7:52 AM"I think it's unfair to women in general that men at least get their turn to become that distinguished gentleman, as well as enjoy their youthful looking days, having fun with the college girls/older tigers."
Sorry, this just stuck out to me. You guys DO realize that the average male doesn't become "distinguished" don't you? On the contrary, on average we become fatter and hairier but the hair moves around. You make it sound as if we hit 50 and magically start looking like Ricardo Montalban during his Fantasy Island years. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 10, 2008 - 9:16 AMit's true... there is really only a handful of Clooneys and Connerys out there...
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 10, 2008 - 11:29 AMGood point Josh. In fact, a good chunk of men start losing their looks in their 30's. My ex is a sad example (not why we broke up!) but he went from hot and svelte to bald, pasty and having the body of a toddler. I always thought that must really mess with his mind. He was so dreamy in his early 20's.
I have to say, I spent this morning working with some women who were models (they're still in their 20's) and they were so annoying. They kept talking about how all the best jobs are from modeling agencies and couldn't stop gushing about all the wonderful (and probably fabricated) opportunities are coming their way. Ok, if it's so great, why ar you tying balloons to invitations for money? My comment about the wonderful adavntage of beauty was not responded to. Yuck. I can see how beautiful people, particularly those who act entitled because of it or define themselves by it, can bring the disdain upon themselves. Really, I didn;t even see what was so exceptional about them. I did notice that they all talked about people in terms of their looks. Needless to say, I kept to myself and just focused on the money I was making. The jerks always ruin it for everyone else, don't they?
I did get to see Spike Lee, though!
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 10, 2008 - 3:48 PMJosh - "on average we become fatter and hairier but the hair moves around."
Yes, yes you do. But so do we generally so it's all equal really. Thanks for the laugh....though I'm not sure who exactly find Ricardo Montalban sexy! -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 10, 2008 - 4:15 PM -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Fri, July 11, 2008 - 7:53 AM"apparently Josh does!
i17.photobucket.com/albums/b...alban.jpg
:) "
"KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, July 10, 2008 - 11:34 PMYeah I am just old bald and hairy. But fuck it I can fix anything.
JSin -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Fri, July 11, 2008 - 1:17 AMAlright, I digress, not ALL men become distinguished, BUT if a man has an awesome personality, he can slay, SLAY, at any age. A woman with an awesome personality at, say 50, is just deemed a cool old lady (I wish she were my mom.) -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Fri, July 11, 2008 - 6:56 AMTinkles - Hmmm, not sure I agree with you...and I have some experience in this area. At 44 I still get cruised by younger guys, I know quite a few older women (some in their late 40 and in their 50s, some in their 30s) who have younger boyfriends, and older independent women with wealth can have the same kind of decorative fresh young things as lovers or partners as older men who are affluent. Granted I probably run in circles that are very far from the middle American experience but the hot older lady has currency in my world. That said, there seems to be a bit of a trend towards appreciating hot older women - but then again that may be the circles I run in!
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, July 16, 2008 - 7:27 PMYou guys DO realize that the average male doesn't become "distinguished" don't you? On the contrary, on average we become fatter and hairier but the hair moves around. You make it sound as if we hit 50 and magically start looking like Ricardo Montalban during his Fantasy Island years.
~~~~~~~
Your wife is such a lucky woman.
-
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Wed, July 16, 2008 - 6:50 PMAs women pass their prime, of course they acquire different skills to remain socially viable -- this is the way it has been throughout history. And when men are younger, they have traditionally been taken advantage of in their own ways, such as being sent to fight/die in wars, and generally being treated coldly and without compassion. The rites of manhood generally involve swallowing extreme amounts of inner pain. We are unable to play the victim, unlike women who are encouraged to do so.
~~~~~~~~~
l think l love you. And that includes your entire post, not just the snippet l quote here. -
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, July 26, 2008 - 7:53 PMlevel?
~~~~~~~~~~
Huh? ls this to me? -
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Tue, August 12, 2008 - 6:04 PMl guess it's something like a 10....? ;) -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, August 14, 2008 - 1:35 PMI had a level 18 half-elf wizard (who was chaotic-neutral) once in AD&D. Hot damn he kicked some orc ass!
oh wait, did I type that out loud?... -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, October 18, 2008 - 6:16 PMWho unsubbed? -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, October 18, 2008 - 7:23 PMim assuming it was mick (jagger-punk-hairstyle, red background to face-shot). in-n-out again... -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, October 19, 2008 - 9:41 AMYes. But it was Keith Richards in the photo.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Thu, August 28, 2008 - 6:36 AMMy take on this coming from the view point of an average looking woman-
I have average looks but have found over the years that as you call them beautiful men tend to have an interest in me. I find this very flattering but have never pursued anything more than a friendship. I have found that many of these men have all the perks as you say but are very superficial and tend to place me into the typical female role which I am not. I also find many of them to be self centered and expect complete adoration from others. Men that change girlfriends on a whim are quite insecure under their facade whereby they are unable to get close to anyone. They don't go deep with anyone including themselves. They define themselves by all the attention they get and it all seems so empty and unfulfilling.
Personally I want to connect with someone who is not afraid to go deep and is a best friend concerned and interested in who I really am. Someone who is a giver not a taker in the world. I am looking for a challenge, someone to grow with spiritually and is working on themselves. I'll bypass all the romance bs. I want to feel "close" and at home with someone not on an adrenaline rush where there is so much projecting going on. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sun, September 14, 2008 - 6:57 PMI just want to say that I have seen many many many beautiful women act that way also...believing that because they are gorgeous, they are intitled to do whatever they want , whenever they want to the men who love them, that verything is owed to them.
Several men I have dated were pretty hansome...and I sometimes was surprised they approached me ( I am not ugly but not that pretty either). And so I would ask them why they weren,t hitting on the hot chicks around us. The main answer tends to be that really pretty girls treat them like absolute trash once they got what they wanted out of them...
So I guess those traits are not really gender specific. -
-
Re: The dichotomy of being beautiful
Sat, October 18, 2008 - 6:14 PMThis thread kept going for that long?? Wow.
-
-
